Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Cooper/Andreason

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-10vs Spanish Fork-JensenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTracie Cooper / Jennie Stacey vs TRACY PADGETT / Karen Wilson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChieko Perry vs Tina Taylor6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBecky Hall / Jennifer Kane vs Michelle Fowkes / Carrie Jensen6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCari Johnson / Sara Ray vs Cherylin Winkel / Robyn Cardon2-6, 1-6
2021-08-03Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Clark / LaNece Andreason vs Lori Wilson / Natalie Stobbe1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennie Stacey vs Yoko Walljasper6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTracie Cooper / Sara Ray vs Diane Poole / Michelle Burnett2-6, 4-6
2021-07-27Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChieko Perry / Sandra Clark vs Suzanne Burdge / Lori Curtis5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaNece Andreason / Sara Ray vs Shirley Johnson / Cecia Croft1-6, 0-6
2021-07-21Lost 04
L#1 DoublesLaNece Andreason / Sandra Clark vs Taeeui Ham / Kristi Warren2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChieko Perry vs Melissa Despain3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCari Johnson / Kathrine Wright vs Sarah Love / Heidi Maxfield1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTracie Cooper / Jennie Stacey vs Elaine Hansen / Kristy Simmons2-6, 4-6
2021-07-13vs Salt Lake Tennis-BaynaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennie Stacey / Chieko Perry vs Jennifer Tooley / Carolyn Cottle6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracie Cooper / LaNece Andreason vs Jan Watts / Annette Ludlow2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Sorensen / Sandra Clark vs Delia Bayna / Shanna Sirstins2-6, 2-6
2021-07-06Lost 04
L#1 DoublesLaNece Andreason / Jennifer Kane vs Lauren Annunziata / Janice Stokes-Burns6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChieko Perry vs Christina Eischeid3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathrine Wright / Mary Sorensen vs Mindi Paskins / Beata Kieffer0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTracie Cooper / Jennie Stacey vs Kim Cronin / Michelle Maxfield2-6, 4-6
2021-06-22vs Brighton High School-CarruthersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKarla Block / Cari Johnson vs Shelly Kemp / Sherry Young5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Kane vs SherRon Kessel4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaNece Andreason / Tracie Cooper vs Linda Carruthers / Janine Piper6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Clark / Mary Sorensen vs KayeLynn BASTIAN / Deanne Griffiths7-6, 6-3
2021-06-15vs Spanish Fork-JensenLost 12
L#1 DoublesBecky Hall / LaNece Andreason vs Haley Skinner / Cherylin Winkel5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Kane vs Robyn Cardon6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Sorensen / Tracie Cooper vs Carrie Jensen / TRACY PADGETT2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Chieko Perry
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.36
Sara Ray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Becky Hall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Mary Sorensen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Cari Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Kathrine Wright
published 3
2.40
Karla Block
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3
Jennifer Kane
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
LaNece Andreason
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Sandra Clark
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Stacey + Sara Ray3260% games+8.6% vs expected
LaNece Andreason + Becky Hall6849% games+2.4% vs expected
Cari Johnson + Sara Ray1440% games−11.7% vs expected
LaNece Andreason + Mary Sorensen1443% gamesnot enough data
LaNece Andreason + Sara Ray134 matchesnot enough data
LaNece Andreason + Jennie Stacey213 matchesnot enough data
Karla Block + Cari Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Kane + Sandra Clark213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chieko Perry
80W–103L career · 5 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Sara Ray
85W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Becky Hall
189W–166L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Mary Sorensen
43W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Kathrine Wright
39W–41L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Karla Block
108W–230L career · type A · 14 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
2.40
Jennifer Kane
29W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
LaNece Andreason
42W–88L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Clark
19W–33L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.