Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Stoner

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.5W PM

15 players · average NTRP 4.31 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 4.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Mooney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Emily Bott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.20
Kecia Dallin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Arashan Heikkila
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Nanette Heath
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Carey Hopkins
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.92
Emily Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.92
Vicky Arne
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.90
Catherine Bliss
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.82
Carlene Kemp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.78
Shanda Stoner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Angela Kelson
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.62
Holli Turner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Michelle Moscon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
LIZ CARLSON
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Wallace + Nanette Heath351358% games+5.9% vs expected
Carlene Kemp + Emily Wallace3940% games+3.4% vs expected
Catherine Bliss + Arashan Heikkila301455% games+3.1% vs expected
LIZ CARLSON + Nanette Heath3355% games+0.1% vs expected
Christina Mooney + LIZ CARLSON353351% games−1.9% vs expected
Michelle Moscon + Emily Bott171349% games−2.4% vs expected
Michelle Moscon + Shanda Stoner1435% games−15.3% vs expected
Carlene Kemp + Michelle Moscon0733% games−17.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Mooney
60W–46L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Emily Bott
50W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Kecia Dallin
67W–44L career · 11 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Arashan Heikkila
188W–76L career · 9 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Nanette Heath
134W–74L career · 8 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Carey Hopkins
5W–8L career · type S · 5 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Emily Wallace
93W–98L career · 7 lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Vicky Arne
254W–151L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Catherine Bliss
239W–169L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4.5
Carlene Kemp
58W–195L career · 8 lines in 2021
92%8%<1%
3.82
Shanda Stoner
39W–112L career · 10 lines in 2021
95%5%<1%
3.78
4
Angela Kelson
18W–34L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Holli Turner
82W–68L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Michelle Moscon
90W–148L career · 12 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
LIZ CARLSON
45W–50L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.