Teams

4.5 Qualifying Team

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 4.5 - 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.12 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-18vs SchaubWon 21
L#1 SinglesDanielle Smith vs Jennifer Poetzl4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSusie Luebbe / Ann Waters vs Donna Miller / Paula Thomson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJade Goodyear-Anderson / Jennifer Nielson vs Paige Darden / Virginia Montague6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-17vs SchaubWon 21
W#1 SinglesDanielle Smith vs Jennifer Poetzl6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJade Goodyear-Anderson / Sarah Bach vs Becky King / Mary Ritchie6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL vs Miki Fukushima4-6, 2-6
2021-06-17vs SchaubLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Smith / Sarah Bach vs Becky King / Mary Ritchie4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL vs Miki Fukushima7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusie Luebbe / Ann Waters vs Katelyn Schaub / Nikki LaRue6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schaub309612110
24.5 Qualifying Team036922163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.03
Susie Luebbe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Ann Waters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Sarah Bach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Danielle Smith
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jennifer Nielson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katelyn Schaub
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Smith + Sarah Bach2441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AMY BELLAMAH-DANIEL
46W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
Susie Luebbe
35W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Ann Waters
25W–15L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Sarah Bach
59W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Danielle Smith
59W–50L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
Jennifer Nielson
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Katelyn Schaub
17W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.