Teams

Kiest/Brasko-Langlois W6.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 65 & Over ADULT Friday · W6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-16vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesNoreen Janick / Lily Megill vs Alice Rana / Garretta Saunders4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCatherine Bass / Joyce Kain vs Rosemary Janney / Debbie Springer6-1, 6-3
2025-05-09vs SpringPark/Farley-Zartler W6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnita Thomas / Noreen Janick vs Alma Farley / Betty Sue Wheeler2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarlene Langlois / Lily Megill vs Ellen Euting / Fran Zartler2-6, 3-6
2025-05-02vs SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette McCracken / Leah Ann Neal vs Sandy Anderson / Carolyn Jean Schaefer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnita Thomas / Mitzi Bishop vs Cindy Maxwell / Linda Braswell2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNoreen Janick / Catherine Bass vs Anne Porter / Janet Stetson6-1, 6-0
2025-04-25vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSharon Balthrop / Noreen Janick vs Shawnn Henderson / Cindy Maack7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMitzi Bishop / Catherine Bass vs Kathy Evans / Lois Webb3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarlene Langlois / Joyce Kain vs Donna Coyle / Melissa Szabo6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-11vs SpringPark/Farley-Zartler W6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Balthrop / Noreen Janick vs Ellen Euting / Mary Martinez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Bass / Joyce Kain vs Fran Zartler / Alma Farley5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnita Thomas / Nancy Greer vs Betty Sue Wheeler / Heidi Walsh6-1, 6-2
2025-04-10vs SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Balthrop / Anita Thomas vs Linda Braswell / Cindy Maxwell3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMitzi Bishop / Noreen Janick vs Janet Stetson / Ellen Templin6-3, 6-3
2025-04-07vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnita Thomas / Sharon Balthrop vs Rosemary Janney / Garretta Saunders6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMitzi Bishop / Leah Ann Neal vs Shawnn Henderson / Kathy Evans1-6, 2-6
2025-03-21vs SpringPark/Farley-Zartler W6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLeah Ann Neal / Joyce Kain vs Pamela Ferrell / Ellen Euting1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Greer / Annette McCracken vs Linda Hodge / Alma Farley1-6, 0-6
2025-03-14vs SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Thomas / Sharon Balthrop vs Linda Braswell / Cindy Maxwell3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNoreen Janick / Leah Ann Neal vs Dianne Ball / Rebecca Pearson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarlene Langlois / Lily Megill vs Susan McGeehan / Ellen Templin6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Noreen Janick
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.88
Catherine Bass
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Nancy Greer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Annette McCracken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Anita Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Joyce Kain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Crouch
published
Leah Ann Neal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lily Megill
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marlene Langlois
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mitzi Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Brasko
published
Sharon Balthrop
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Bass + Joyce Kain5552% gamesnot enough data
Leah Ann Neal + Joyce Kain123 matchesnot enough data
Anita Thomas + Sharon Balthrop033 matchesnot enough data
Judy Crouch + Lily Megill033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noreen Janick
20W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Catherine Bass
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Nancy Greer
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.76
3
Annette McCracken
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anita Thomas
2W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Joyce Kain
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Crouch
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Ann Neal
9W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lily Megill
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marlene Langlois
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mitzi Bishop
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Brasko
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Balthrop
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.