Teams

SpringPark/Farley-Zartler W6.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 65 & Over ADULT Friday · W6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.08 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-16vs SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesEllen Euting / Judy Archbold vs Cindy Maxwell / Rebecca Pearson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlma Farley / Fran Zartler vs Anne Porter / Ellen Templin6-2, 6-0
2025-05-14vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJan Freshwater / Chin Su vs Alice Rana / Garretta Saunders6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Euting / Fran Zartler vs Rosemary Janney / Debbie Springer6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Walsh / Sharon Blythe vs Cindy Maack / Tami Behner6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-09vs Kiest/Brasko-Langlois W6.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesAlma Farley / Betty Sue Wheeler vs Anita Thomas / Noreen Janick6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Euting / Fran Zartler vs Marlene Langlois / Lily Megill6-2, 6-3
2025-04-25vs SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesJudy Archbold / Ellen Euting vs Linda Braswell / Cindy Maxwell6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlma Farley / Fran Zartler vs Janet Stetson / Karen McHugh6-0, 6-2
2025-04-14vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlma Farley / Mary Martinez vs Alice Rana / Lois Webb0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFran Zartler / Ellen Euting vs Tami Behner / Melissa Szabo6-7, 4-6
2025-04-11vs Kiest/Brasko-Langlois W6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Euting / Mary Martinez vs Sharon Balthrop / Noreen Janick7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFran Zartler / Alma Farley vs Catherine Bass / Joyce Kain7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBetty Sue Wheeler / Heidi Walsh vs Anita Thomas / Nancy Greer1-6, 2-6
2025-03-31vs SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Archbold / Ellen Euting vs Janet Stetson / Sandy Anderson6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFran Zartler / Pamela Ferrell vs Cindy Maxwell / Linda Braswell4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJan Freshwater / Linda Hodge vs Anne Porter / Carolyn Jean Schaefer6-4, 6-3
2025-03-21vs Kiest/Brasko-Langlois W6.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Ferrell / Ellen Euting vs Leah Ann Neal / Joyce Kain6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Hodge / Alma Farley vs Nancy Greer / Annette McCracken6-1, 6-0
2025-03-14vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJudy Archbold / Ellen Euting vs Alice Rana / Garretta Saunders6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChin Su / Linda Hodge vs Shawnn Henderson / Rosemary Janney4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · W6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SpringPark/Farley-Zartler W6.07220717162
2LB Houston/O'Brien W6.054141329237
3SpringPark/Petty-Porter W6.045121534264
4Kiest/Brasko-Langlois W6.02781939268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Pamela Ferrell
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
2.95
Fran Zartler
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.93
Lisa Stolakis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Ellen Euting
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alma Farley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Betty Sue Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Heidi Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Chin Su
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jan Freshwater
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Judy Archbold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Hodge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Loretta Middlebrook
published
Mary Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Blythe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fran Zartler + Pamela Ferrell12853% games−10.4% vs expected
Ellen Euting + Judy Archbold4265% gamesnot enough data
Alma Farley + Fran Zartler5161% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Euting + Pamela Ferrell404 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Euting + Fran Zartler213 matchesnot enough data
Alma Farley + Mary Martinez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Ferrell
37W–28L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Fran Zartler
22W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lisa Stolakis
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.93
3.5
Ellen Euting
11W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
Alma Farley
8W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Betty Sue Wheeler
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Heidi Walsh
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chin Su
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.62
Jan Freshwater
7W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Archbold
11W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Hodge
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Loretta Middlebrook
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Martinez
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Blythe
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.