Teams

Team Holliday

2023 SCTA Doubles - Bakersfield · 4.0 Women's-Bake

11 players · average NTRP 3.71 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-19vs LLW - Bako -Team TkacLost 01
L#2 DoublesNatalie Chene / Rhonda Slegers vs Cindy Broussard / Heather Tkac1-6, 1-6
2023-11-11vs LLW - Bako -Team TkacLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinette Holliday / Edyta Grant vs Andrea Ames / Leigh-Anne Fourie2-6, 3-6
2023-10-28vs LLW - Bako -Team TkacSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLaura Amason / Rhonda Slegers vs Sally Goossen / Leigh-Anne Fourie1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Duquette / Rochelle Torgusen vs Beth van Voorhis / Andrea Ames2-6, 1-6
2023-10-15vs LLW - Bako -Team TkacLost 01
L#2 DoublesRochelle Torgusen / Amy Meger vs Nikki Hiebert / Heather Tkac0-6, 3-6
2023-10-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesDenise Duquette / Linette Holliday vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-01vs LLW - Bako -Team TkacLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Amason / Rhonda Slegers vs Lindsey Zimmerman / Andrea Ames1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLinette Holliday / Agnes DeJong vs SENEA GARRIQUEZ / Cindy Broussard2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women's-Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Natalie Chene
published
3.79
Rochelle Torgusen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Laura Amason
published
3.50
Amy Meger
published 4
3.49
Denise Duquette
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.42
Susan Frakes
published
3.35
Rhonda Slegers
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.33
Edyta Grant
published 3.5
3.25
Linette Holliday
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Rebecca Badgett
published
3.11
Agnes DeJong
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Slegers + Linette Holliday5350% gamesnot enough data
Edyta Grant + Natalie Chene303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Chene
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Rochelle Torgusen
48W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Laura Amason
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Amy Meger
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Denise Duquette
37W–25L career · 8 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
Susan Frakes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Rhonda Slegers
54W–40L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Edyta Grant
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Linette Holliday
118W–107L career · 10 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Rebecca Badgett
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Agnes DeJong
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.