Teams

Willow Fork - Untouchaballs

2026 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · 4.0 Ladies Singles

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-25vs HFTC - Backhand BadgersLost 12
W#1 SinglesMaryna Poltavska vs Rebecca Haskin6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMartha Ruiz vs Lessette Hubenak1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLisa Mccarty vs Mary Margaret McCormick2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-18vs JCC - Muchus Serv-acesWon 21
L#1 SinglesAndrea Verges vs Marisa Martinez4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMaryna Poltavska vs Nataliya Bulayeva6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesGeorgina Allende vs Emma Haywood6-3, 6-2
2026-03-11vs HFTC - Backhand BadgersLost 03
L#1 SinglesAndrea Verges vs Tia Nicole1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesNora Lebedzinski vs Susan Speer2-6, 0-6
L#4 SinglesKatherine Rowe vs Lessette Hubenak1-6, 3-6
2026-02-25vs Arbor Park - 1 vs 1Lost 12
L#2 SinglesMaryna Poltavska vs Brooke Clark2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMartha Ruiz vs Gabriela Montes7-5, 6-2
L#4 SinglesLisa Mccarty vs Sayuri Pinon1-6, 2-6
2026-02-18vs LLTC - Queens of the CourtLost 13
L#1 SinglesAndrea Verges vs Andrea Fakhoury4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesGeorgina Allende vs Carolina Suarez6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesNora Lebedzinski vs Ramsey Robinson3-6, 1-6
L#4 SinglesKatherine Rowe vs Kelsey Corrigan3-6, 0-6
2026-02-11vs HFTC - Good VibrationWon 31
W#1 SinglesAndrea Verges vs Jill Martin6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMaryna Poltavska vs Laura Martellino1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMartha Ruiz vs Kristy Kirkman7-5, 6-2
W#4 SinglesNora Lebedzinski vs Marie Martinez7-5, 6-4
2026-02-07vs JCC - Muchus Serv-acesLost 12
W#2 SinglesMartha Ruiz vs Yvonne Puente6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesNora Lebedzinski vs Noriko Chandler2-6, 1-6
L#4 SinglesLisa Mccarty vs Nataliya Bulayeva3-6, 2-6
2026-02-04vs Kingwood CC - Game Set RollLost 12
L#2 SinglesAndrea Verges vs Carrie Simms6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 SinglesGeorgina Allende vs Monica Roberts6-1, 6-3
L#4 SinglesMaryna Poltavska vs Preeti Gangadharan3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Andrea Verges
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.45
Maryna Poltavska
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.40
Georgina Allende
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.37
Martha Ruiz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.16
Nora Lebedzinski
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #4 Singles 25% · published
3.15
Lisa Mccarty
usually #4 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.04
Katherine Rowe
usually #4 Singles 100% · published
Jackie Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Georgina Allende + Andrea Verges4154% games+13.3% vs expected
Georgina Allende + Nora Lebedzinski3349% games+13.0% vs expected
Georgina Allende + Maryna Poltavska123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Verges
62W–63L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Maryna Poltavska
39W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Georgina Allende
43W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Martha Ruiz
36W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Nora Lebedzinski
32W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
Lisa Mccarty
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Katherine Rowe
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Jackie Brown
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.