Teams

HFTC - Good Vibration

2026 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · 4.0 Ladies Singles

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-25vs LLTC - Queens of the CourtLost 02
L#2 SinglesMaria Glopil Pasamonte vs Ramsey Robinson1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesKristy Kirkman vs Kristin Montalvo4-6, 3-6
2026-03-04vs Kingwood CC - Game Set RollLost 01
L#4 SinglesKristy Kirkman vs Shannon Walker1-6, 3-6
2026-02-25vs HFTC - Backhand BadgersSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKristy Kirkman vs Lessette Hubenak6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMaria Glopil Pasamonte vs Cassidy Goode1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-18vs JCC - Muchus Serv-acesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLaura Martellino vs Marisa Martinez2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMarie Martinez vs Therese Tran6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-11vs Willow Fork - UntouchaballsLost 12
W#2 SinglesLaura Martellino vs Maryna Poltavska6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKristy Kirkman vs Martha Ruiz5-7, 2-6
L#4 SinglesMarie Martinez vs Nora Lebedzinski5-7, 4-6
2026-02-04vs Arbor Park - 1 vs 1Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKristy Kirkman vs Maria Garcia-Mireles3-6, 3-6
2026-01-28vs LLTC - Queens of the CourtLost 02
L#2 SinglesKristy Kirkman vs Vivian Huang1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesDiane White vs Kelsey Corrigan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Eleanor Putnam-Farr
published
3.62
Diane White
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.51
Laura Martellino
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.49
Maria Glopil Pasamonte
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.33
Linda Jacobs
published
3.24
Kristy Kirkman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Marie Martinez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #4 Singles 50% · published
Jill Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Jacobs + Diane White1438% games−7.9% vs expected
Linda Jacobs + Eleanor Putnam-Farr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eleanor Putnam-Farr
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Diane White
23W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Laura Martellino
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Maria Glopil Pasamonte
9W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Linda Jacobs
47W–78L career · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.33
Kristy Kirkman
15W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.24
Marie Martinez
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Jill Martin
14W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.