Teams

JCC - Muchus Serv-aces

2026 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · 4.0 Ladies Singles

6 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-18vs Willow Fork - UntouchaballsLost 12
W#1 SinglesMarisa Martinez vs Andrea Verges6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesNataliya Bulayeva vs Maryna Poltavska4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEmma Haywood vs Georgina Allende3-6, 2-6
2026-03-04vs Arbor Park - 1 vs 1Lost 12
L#2 SinglesNataliya Bulayeva vs Brooke Clark6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTherese Tran vs Maria Vazquez4-6, 1-6
W#4 SinglesEmma Haywood vs Monica Madden6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-25vs LLTC - Queens of the CourtLost 01
L#3 SinglesNataliya Bulayeva vs Ramsey Robinson2-6, 3-6
2026-02-18vs HFTC - Good VibrationSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMarisa Martinez vs Laura Martellino6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTherese Tran vs Marie Martinez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-11vs Kingwood CC - Game Set RollLost 01
L#1 SinglesYvonne Puente vs Ruxandra Buzoeanu1-6, 0-6
2026-02-07vs Willow Fork - UntouchaballsLost 12
L#1 SinglesMarisa Martinez vs Jackie Brown1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesYvonne Puente vs Martha Ruiz4-6, 2-6
W#4 SinglesNataliya Bulayeva vs Lisa Mccarty6-3, 6-2
2026-02-04vs HFTC - Backhand BadgersLost 03
L#1 SinglesYvonne Puente vs Susan Speer6-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesNataliya Bulayeva vs Concetta Balestra Fagan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 SinglesEmma Haywood vs Lindsey Upton0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Marisa Martinez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Singles 50% · published
3.43
Yvonne Puente
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Emma Haywood
usually #4 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.23
Nataliya Bulayeva
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Noriko Chandler
published
Therese Tran
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emma Haywood + Noriko Chandler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marisa Martinez
23W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Yvonne Puente
119W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Emma Haywood
36W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Nataliya Bulayeva
41W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Noriko Chandler
74W–70L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Therese Tran
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.