Teams

Senter 18

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-19vs Atterbury 18Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wescott / Lauren Rasar vs Diana Rode / Megan Atterbury4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKimberly Batten vs Karen McCarty3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Broderick / Desiree Morgan vs Shayla Durst / Lisa Gilbert5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJill Scerri / Katie Swain vs Melissa Rahe / Anne Egger6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-26vs MainLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Senter / Caitlyn Stogner vs Lindsay Parker / Kristin Main1-6, 0-6
2025-04-12vs ThompsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaitlyn Stogner / Heather Senter vs Janet Waren / Louise Sloan2-6, 5-7
2025-03-22vs HALLERWon 31
L#1 DoublesLauren Rasar / Ashlee Ramsey vs Genevieve Hansler / Caitlynn Goheen4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTaylor Waddle vs Nicole Slocumb6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Broderick / Kimberly Batten vs Cheryl Lachowicz / Trinh Luu7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Swain / Kristine Janik vs Linda Haller / Renee Saffo6-0, 2-0
2025-03-15vs HarrisonLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Senter / Lauren Rasar vs Lara Hanks / Angie Hill3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Tatum 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Senter / Taylor Waddle vs Vickie Kosh / Kristy Cousineau6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Katie Swain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Kimberly Batten
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Lauren Rasar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Kylie Knapp
published
3.77
Anne Broderick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Taylor Waddle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Caitlyn Stogner
published 4
3.73
Desiree Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Amy Kullberg
published 4
3.62
Jennifer Wescott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Jill Scerri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Ashlee Ramsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Heather Senter
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Janik
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Broderick + Desiree Morgan0547% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Rasar + Desiree Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Broderick + Kristine Janik213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Scerri + Amy Kullberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Swain
31W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
Kimberly Batten
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Lauren Rasar
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Kylie Knapp
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Anne Broderick
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Taylor Waddle
38W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Caitlyn Stogner
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Desiree Morgan
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amy Kullberg
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Jennifer Wescott
16W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Jill Scerri
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Ashlee Ramsey
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Heather Senter
243W–166L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kristine Janik
19W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.