Teams

CSU

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-07-01vs HMTC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Ketcham / Scott Kunze vs Bruce Malloy / Bobby Diaz6-4, 7-5
2022-06-24vs MLFWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Kunze / James DuPriest vs James Dyer / Lyle Petersen6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDennis Tralmer / Edward Kendall vs Rodney Campos / Frank Duhring4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMike Keefe / Joseph Maurier vs William Brothers / Dale Clarken6-0, 6-2
2022-06-17vs TAGWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames DuPriest / Joseph Maurier vs Tim Beckman / Glen Buckingham6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Hiller / Dennis Tralmer vs Steve Weber / Patrick Berkheim6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWade Bontempo / Scott Kunze vs John Trull / Jack Tuttle6-2, 6-2
2022-06-10vs LVTA REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesDennis Tralmer / Andrew Hiller vs Paul Akers / David Jeffries7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Woodmansee / Mike Keefe vs William Popp / Ken Field6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJames DuPriest / Shane Miller vs William Donkersgoed / Dave Trammell6-1, 6-2
2022-06-10vs HMTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Kunze / Scott Martin vs Mark Sundstedt / Gary Westlind6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-03vs LVTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hiller / Shane Miller vs James Morrison / William Reents6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoseph Maurier / Mike Keefe vs Ron Bakel / Bob Shearer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdward Kendall / Dennis Tralmer vs Jim Walker / Randy Hensley6-4, 7-6
2022-05-25vs TAGWon 30
W#1 DoublesDennis Tralmer / Joseph Maurier vs John Trull / Jack Tuttle6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Woodmansee / Shane Miller vs Tim Beckman / Michael Malnati6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWade Bontempo / Scott Kunze vs Eric Pavilonis / Frank Skudrzyk7-5, 6-0
2022-05-13vs MLFWon 30
W#1 DoublesDennis Tralmer / Joseph Maurier vs James Cooper / John Fruhwirth6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMike Keefe / Robert Woodmansee vs James Dyer / Lyle Petersen7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWade Bontempo / Edward Kendall vs William Brothers / Thomas Kissler6-4, 6-3
2022-05-06vs LVTA REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Kunze / Dennis Tralmer vs Paul Akers / David Jeffries6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrew Hiller / Joseph Maurier vs Ken Field / David Sampson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Woodmansee / Shane Miller vs Mark Christensen / Dave Trammell6-2, 6-2
2022-04-29vs FCCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Ketcham / Scott Kunze vs Robin Wick / Dan Johnson6-3, 7-6
2022-04-29vs LVTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hiller / Wade Bontempo vs Virgil Downing / Ron Bakel6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMike Keefe / Robert Woodmansee vs Randy Hensley / Jim Walker6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEdward Kendall / Shane Miller vs Dean Pflughoeft / William Reents7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Shane Miller
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Dennis Tralmer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
James DuPriest
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrew Hiller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Mike Keefe
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Joseph Maurier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Edward Kendall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Robert Woodmansee
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Scott Kunze
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Wade Bontempo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Keefe + Robert Woodmansee10459% gamesnot enough data
Shane Miller + Robert Woodmansee9066% gamesnot enough data
Mike Keefe + Andrew Hiller1440% gamesnot enough data
Shane Miller + Andrew Hiller224 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Maurier + Mike Keefe404 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Maurier + Andrew Hiller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shane Miller
49W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Dennis Tralmer
31W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
James DuPriest
30W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Andrew Hiller
23W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Mike Keefe
36W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Joseph Maurier
74W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Edward Kendall
72W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.04
Robert Woodmansee
29W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Kunze
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wade Bontempo
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.