Teams

Stanley/Rumbach/Sherwood/BP

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Courtney Newell
published 4
3.78
Laura Allmond
published
3.70
Tiffani Jedlicka
published
3.33
Pauline Godoy
published
3.30
Sarah Sisco
published
3.24
Amy Rainey
published 3.5
3.20
Tiffany Garretson
published
3.19
Milli Stanley
published
3.06
Elly Rumbach
published
3.06
Haylee Scott
published
3.05
Brandi Watts
published 3
3.05
Kara Bloomfield
published
2.94
Allyson Hendrix
published 3
2.84
2.68
Martha Wooten
published
Tracy Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Wooten + Brandi Watts8554% games+5.4% vs expected
Courtney Newell + Tiffani Jedlicka3447% games−4.0% vs expected
Brandi Watts + Anna Catherine Cargile4164% gamesnot enough data
Laura Allmond + Tiffani Jedlicka404 matchesnot enough data
Haylee Scott + Sarah Sisco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Newell
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
Laura Allmond
39W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Tiffani Jedlicka
54W–27L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Pauline Godoy
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Sarah Sisco
22W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Amy Rainey
11W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Tiffany Garretson
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Milli Stanley
26W–33L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Elly Rumbach
32W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
Haylee Scott
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Brandi Watts
42W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kara Bloomfield
24W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Allyson Hendrix
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Anna Catherine Cargile
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Martha Wooten
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.68
Tracy Foster
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.