Teams

Serves you right.

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - POCATELLO · Women 3.5 - 18 & OVER

19 players · average NTRP 3.19 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-21vs Overhead UnderdogsLost 14
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Grace Jory / Shanea Bevins2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAly Burgoyne vs Lyn McArthur5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVenita Petti / Victoria Scharp vs Monica Mispireta / Heather Farnsworth3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Annie Thomas2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Nelson / Teresa Henderson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-18vs Ditch WitchLost 05
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / Robbie Spicer vs Lexi Fullmer / Allishia Sanford3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAllyson Laible vs Wendy Elison5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPanayota Semons-Short / Michele Surmelis vs Melissa Brake / Quincy Sutton2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAmber Nelson vs Melissa Suru1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKarlee Moeai / Rachel Stein vs Sarah Davids / Aspin Rhoades1-6, 3-6
2025-06-16vs Ditch WitchLost 14
W#1 DoublesAllyson Laible / Robbie Spicer vs Kim Hickey / Heather McGeehan7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Melissa Suru3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPanayota Semons-Short / Michele Surmelis vs Sarah Davids / Wendy Elison3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesRachel Stein vs Mikel Harmon1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Nelson / Karlee Moeai vs Aspin Rhoades / Allishia Sanford0-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs Ditch WitchLost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Nelson / Amber Nelson vs Sarah Davids / Rachel Mattson7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Quincy Sutton4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKarlee Moeai / Michele Surmelis vs Lyndsi Whitworth / Heather McGeehan3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKaren Dickerson vs Kim Hickey6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Teresa Henderson vs Aspin Rhoades / Wendy Elison3-6, 4-6
2025-05-28vs Overhead UnderdogsWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Nelson / Robbie Spicer vs Diane Poole / Rachel Smith7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKaren Dickerson vs Monica Mispireta6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Rose Lindley / Teresa Henderson vs Anita Gibson / Lyn McArthur6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAly Burgoyne vs Annie Thomas6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVenita Petti / Allyson Laible vs Emily Smith / Grace Jory4-6, 5-7
2025-05-21vs Overhead UnderdogsLost 05
L#1 DoublesVictoria Scharp / Cami Ellis vs Anita Gibson / Heather Farnsworth6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKirsten Nickisch vs Angela Gallafent3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShauna Myler / Robbie Spicer vs Emily Smith / Shanea Bevins6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRachel Stein vs Annie Thomas0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAly Burgoyne / Carrie Rose Lindley vs Diane Poole / Rachel Smith2-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs Ditch WitchLost 05
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / Lisa Nelson vs Wendy Elison / Lexi Fullmer2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKaren Dickerson vs Melissa Suru6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Allyson Laible vs Rachel Mattson / Allishia Sanford2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Stein vs Quincy Sutton0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKarlee Moeai / Michele Surmelis vs Mikel Harmon / Cara Sonnemann3-6, 5-7
2025-05-16vs Overhead UnderdogsLost 14
L#1 DoublesPatricia Bolinger / Shauna Myler vs Diane Poole / Rachel Smith3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Dickerson vs Angela Gallafent5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Scharp / Anna Stein vs Emily Smith / Shanea Bevins0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAly Burgoyne vs Yarah Bisharat6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Nelson / Amber Nelson vs Grace Jory / Anita Gibson6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ditch Witch8037313228
2Overhead Underdogs35152556397
3Serves you right.1783264408

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Teresa Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Allyson Laible
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Anna Stein
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Robbie Spicer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Patricia Bolinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Lisa Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Aly Burgoyne
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Michele Surmelis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Carrie Rose Lindley
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.98
Karen Dickerson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Karlee Moeai
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.87
Amber Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Kirsten Nickisch
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.85
Shauna Myler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Cami Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Panayota Semons-Short
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Rachel Stein
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Victoria Scharp
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Venita Petti
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Nelson + Panayota Semons-Short5160% games+7.4% vs expected
Victoria Scharp + Cami Ellis1538% games+5.7% vs expected
Amber Nelson + Karlee Moeai2350% games+3.0% vs expected
Patricia Bolinger + Lisa Nelson4254% games+2.0% vs expected
Lisa Nelson + Venita Petti61045% games+0.0% vs expected
Lisa Nelson + Teresa Henderson181655% games−0.7% vs expected
Venita Petti + Carrie Rose Lindley7453% games−0.8% vs expected
Michele Surmelis + Panayota Semons-Short171449% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Teresa Henderson
127W–103L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Allyson Laible
15W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Anna Stein
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Robbie Spicer
33W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Patricia Bolinger
16W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Lisa Nelson
73W–131L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Aly Burgoyne
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Michele Surmelis
238W–161L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Carrie Rose Lindley
49W–62L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3.5
Karen Dickerson
66W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Karlee Moeai
84W–53L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Amber Nelson
64W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Kirsten Nickisch
98W–140L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Shauna Myler
104W–147L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
3
Cami Ellis
52W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Panayota Semons-Short
104W–117L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Rachel Stein
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Victoria Scharp
101W–160L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Venita Petti
81W–116L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.