Teams

AM Aces

2022 FALL DAYTIME DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-05vs Doubles or NothingLost 01
L#3 DoublesLora Bonser / Amy Boettcher vs Molly Otter / Betsy McDonald3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-03vs Causing a RacquetSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKarri Jones / Amy Boettcher vs Hailey Smith / Suzanne Malmstrom6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Churchman / Dyan Goulet vs Erica Gibbons / Diana Hornung7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-26vs Alley CatsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLiz Crookston / Stephanie Churchman vs Christine Elwer / Kelly Haskell4-6, 1-6
2022-09-21vs CCC ChaosWon 10
W#2 DoublesDana Rosellini / Carmal Chrisman vs Suzie Wilson / Cindy Haroian6-1, 6-1
2022-09-19vs Doubles or NothingLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Boettcher / Stephanie Churchman vs Julie McDonald / Paige Gustavsen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-14vs Causing a RacquetLost 03
L#1 DoublesDyan Goulet / Tannan Koehl vs Angel Marie Bowie / Erica Gibbons6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmy Boettcher / Angie Magnuson vs Mary Burke / Mary Parsons1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLora Bonser / Carmal Chrisman vs Diana Hornung / Fariss Mcgee1-6, 3-6
2022-09-07vs Alley CatsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Boettcher / Dana Rosellini vs Katheryn Burriesci / Nancy Mallory6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKimberly Prohaska / Carmal Chrisman vs Dawn Crochet / Shannon Lofton1-6, 3-6
2022-08-31vs CCC ChaosSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDyan Goulet / Kimberly Prohaska vs Jill Mckinney / Cathy Drake4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLora Bonser / Amy Boettcher vs Suzie Wilson / Danielle Krawl6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Alley Cats6217717164
2AM Aces53121225197
3Causing a Racquet35111329229
4CCC Chaos0842041269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Dana Rosellini
published 4.5
3.72
Karri Jones
published 4
3.63
Angie Magnuson
published 4
3.32
Amy Boettcher
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Tannan Koehl
published
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.13
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
3.11
Amy Costello
published 3.5
3.10
Dyan Goulet
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Valencia Bilyeu
published 3
2.76
Carmal Chrisman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Christa Napier
published 3
Liz Crookston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dyan Goulet + Stephanie Churchman12661% games+4.4% vs expected
Lora Bonser + Amy Costello5157% games+1.7% vs expected
Amy Boettcher + Angie Magnuson6850% games−3.2% vs expected
Lora Bonser + Valencia Bilyeu71049% games−5.7% vs expected
Christa Napier + Dyan Goulet6846% gamesnot enough data
Amy Boettcher + Stephanie Churchman41047% gamesnot enough data
Tannan Koehl + Dyan Goulet2847% gamesnot enough data
Tannan Koehl + Amy Costello8262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Rosellini
134W–115L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Karri Jones
184W–109L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Angie Magnuson
113W–90L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Amy Boettcher
35W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Tannan Koehl
92W–61L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–92L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amy Costello
148W–95L career · type A · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dyan Goulet
60W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Valencia Bilyeu
145W–124L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Kimberly Prohaska
29W–55L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Carmal Chrisman
26W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Christa Napier
81W–65L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
Liz Crookston
26W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.