Teams

Je.Anderson40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-15vs Ju.Kelly40ALost 02
L#2 DoublesJudith Stewart / Julianne Rothert vs Elizabeth Newton / Ashlie Adams2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Uhland / Lily Li vs Christina Taylor / Lowry Liggon4-6, 1-6
2024-05-01vs Me.Everitt40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Uhland / Julianne Rothert vs Daphne Poulk / Melissa Everitt6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Jeska / Lily Li vs Melissa House / Lan Bello6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Marriott / Tanya Barcinas vs Elizabeth Schuette / Lola Jefferies4-6, 4-6
2024-04-24vs La.Fitzgerald40A3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLily Li / Julianne Rothert vs Nicole Peterson / Liz Arcos4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Karen Hepp vs Suzanne Ruggles / Theresa Rosario-Jansen6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Melissa George vs Adriana Craft / Laurene Fitzgerald7-5, 7-5
2024-04-17vs St.Grose40AWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Uhland / Lily Li vs Kelly Hollis / Jessica Brock6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlison Kalinowski / Tanya Barcinas vs Heather Mordecai / Jennifer Troch6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Melissa George vs Carrie Rice / Candice Kish6-1, 6-4
2024-04-10vs Ju.Kelly40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Straughn / Tanya Barcinas vs Tiffany Barrier / Mary-Peyton Amburn4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Jeska / Karen Hepp vs Ashlie Adams / Christina Taylor5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJudith Stewart / Julianne Rothert vs Elizabeth Newton / Laura Brown3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-03vs Ke.Sutton40ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesLily Li / Julianne Rothert vs Kelly Sutton / Jessica Crawford7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Elizabeth Marriott vs Beth Robertson / Michele Peters6-1, 6-3
2024-03-20vs Me.Everitt40ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Jeska / Karen Hepp vs Melissa Everitt / Melissa House6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Kalinowski / Tanya Barcinas vs Angelica Rose / Heather Hofmann6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-13vs La.Fitzgerald40A3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesJudith Stewart / Emily Uhland vs Marina Barthalmus / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesConnie Haynes / Melissa George vs Meghan Kofod / Suzanne Ruggles6-3, 6-3
2024-03-06vs St.Grose40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesLily Li / Emily Uhland vs Carol Hedley / Carrie Rice6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Jeska / Karen Hepp vs Jennifer Troch / Peggy Williams6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kim Peters
published
3.57
Emily Uhland
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.46
Julianne Rothert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Alison Kalinowski
published 3.5
3.30
Suzanne Jeska
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Elizabeth Marriott
published 3.5
3.28
Karen Hepp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Christy Avery
published 3.5
3.13
Judith Stewart
published
3.13
Tanya Barcinas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Melissa George
published
2.79
Connie Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jennifer Straughn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Jeska + Karen Hepp131058% games+3.4% vs expected
Connie Haynes + Karen Hepp11263% games+1.7% vs expected
Tanya Barcinas + Suzanne Jeska3452% games−8.2% vs expected
Emily Uhland + Connie Haynes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Peters
23W–22L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Emily Uhland
87W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Julianne Rothert
52W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Alison Kalinowski
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Suzanne Jeska
170W–105L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Marriott
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Karen Hepp
174W–98L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Christy Avery
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Judith Stewart
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Tanya Barcinas
206W–149L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
Melissa George
1W–20L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Connie Haynes
147W–79L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
Jennifer Straughn
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.