Teams

Brown K. 55+ 4.0 Mixed Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 55 · 4.0 Mxd Tues PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-22vs Majestic 55+ 4.0 Mixed Tues PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeborah Register / Brad McAmis vs John Graves / Carrie Ganim3-6, 0-6
2025-07-16vs Smith 55's 4.0 Mxd Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Altmann / Kathy Brown vs Jack Walsh / Ann Morris6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanel Green / Myron Herron vs Robert Wells / Nancye Milam6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Pace / Ron Mangrum vs Robert Lynch / Cynthia Sarwi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDeborah Register / Brad McAmis vs John W Quick / Gwen Highsmith-Quick6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-09vs Smith 55's 4.0 Mxd Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesTodd Palmer / Janel Green vs Jim Cantrell / Cynthia Sarwi2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMinerva Loran / David Grubbs vs Caroline McAlister / Jack Walsh6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Brown / Brad McAmis vs Aprille Black / Keith Black7-5, 6-2
2025-06-04vs Lane 55+ 4.0 Mixed Tues PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesJason Altmann / Deborah Register vs Robin Andree / Yvonne Singh6-4, 3-2
W#1 DoublesJason Altmann / Deborah Register vs John W Quick / Gwen Highsmith-Quick6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mxd Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jason Altmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Peter Novosad
published
3.85
Brad McAmis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Deborah Register
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
published
3.56
Ron Mangrum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Minerva Loran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Myron Herron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
David Grubbs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Kathy Brown
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Janel Green
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Register + Peter Novosad303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Altmann
27W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
Peter Novosad
39W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Brad McAmis
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Deborah Register
208W–106L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Ron Mangrum
14W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Myron Herron
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
David Grubbs
27W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kathy Brown
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Janel Green
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.