Teams

Majestic 55+ 4.0 Mixed Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 55 · 4.0 Mxd Tues PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs Lane 55+ 4.0 Mixed Tues PMSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSusie Post-Rust / Scott Majestic vs Libby Strickland / Peter Glud4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDiane Majestic / John Graves vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-22vs Brown K. 55+ 4.0 Mixed Tues PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesRod Schwartz / Lynne Murray vs Peter Novosad / Kathy Pace3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Majestic / Scott Majestic vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-08vs Smith 55's 4.0 Mxd Tues PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Murray / John Rodenbough vs Robert Wells / Nancye Milam6-1, 6-3
2025-06-17vs Brown K. 55+ 4.0 Mixed Tues PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Murray / John Graves vs Minerva Loran / Ron Mangrum6-1, 6-3
2025-06-10vs Lane 55+ 4.0 Mixed Tues PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesRod Schwartz / Lynne Murray vs Tommy Starnes / Christine Hinch6-3, 6-0
2025-06-03vs Smith 55's 4.0 Mxd Tues PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Bolton / Susie Post-Rust vs Keith Black / Cynthia Sarwi7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesCharley Eberhard / Lynne Murray vs Paul Nolan / Joy Martin6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mxd Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Charley Eberhard
published 4
3.97
Carrie Ganim
published 4
3.70
Diane Majestic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lynne Murray
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Jeff Hu
published
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.67
Jon Post
published 4
3.66
John Rodenbough
published
3.64
Rod Schwartz
published
3.62
Kimberly Eberhard
published
3.61
Susie Post-Rust
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Scott Majestic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Post-Rust + Jon Post2363% gamesnot enough data
Charley Eberhard + Kimberly Eberhard123 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Hu + Carrie Ganim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charley Eberhard
11W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Carrie Ganim
25W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Diane Majestic
204W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Lynne Murray
164W–88L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Jeff Hu
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Jon Post
67W–38L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
John Rodenbough
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Rod Schwartz
20W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Kimberly Eberhard
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–94L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Scott Majestic
20W–18L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.