Teams

LCTA39/Johnson-Evanko/LTP-DI

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Sunday

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA39/Johnson/Pine Forest000000
2LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR000000
3LCTA39/Davis/Hanahan000000
4LCTA39/Urbanic/Creekside000000
5LCTA39/Webster/ION000000
6LCTA39/Johnson-Evanko/LTP-DI000000
7LCTA39/Smith/MPR000000
8LCTA39/Stuart/Danny Jones000000
9LCTA39/Hoey/LTP-DI000000
10LCTA39/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews000000
11LCTA39/Christopher/CTC000000
12LCTA39/McMahon Koepenick/Wild Dunes000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Amy Gege
published 3.5
3.22
Dana Heyl
published 3.5
3.18
Traci Kennedy
published
3.17
Karen Easton
published
3.16
Angela Parrott
published 3.5
3.14
Tracey Zirneklis
published
3.12
Heather McGrath
published 3.5
3.00
Robin Parrott
published
3.00
Pooja Paunikar
published
2.88
Ruth Meloeny
published
2.81
Amy Kimball
published 3
2.78
Carol Noble
published 3
2.63
Patty Evanko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Gege + Amy Kimball9261% games+5.8% vs expected
Angela Parrott + Patty Evanko9754% games+0.0% vs expected
Angela Parrott + Robin Parrott122444% games−3.5% vs expected
Ruth Meloeny + Patty Evanko2442% gamesnot enough data
Patty Evanko + Amy Gege3252% gamesnot enough data
Carol Noble + Patty Evanko134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Heyl + Ruth Meloeny213 matchesnot enough data
Angela Parrott + Heather McGrath123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Gege
49W–41L career · type A · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Dana Heyl
12W–27L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Traci Kennedy
9W–24L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Karen Easton
31W–44L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Angela Parrott
72W–75L career · type A · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Tracey Zirneklis
49W–51L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Heather McGrath
24W–32L career · type A · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Robin Parrott
21W–57L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Pooja Paunikar
50W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Ruth Meloeny
66W–66L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Amy Kimball
49W–36L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Carol Noble
34W–59L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Patty Evanko
59W–67L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.