Teams

LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Sunday

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-16vs LCTA39/Johnson/Pine ForestLost 14
L#1 DoublesRebecca Phelps / Katie Donahue vs Kristen Keefe / Stephanie Spinks7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Simmonite vs Beth Armstrong6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaggie Voelkel / Kellyanne Dix vs Susan Riley / Landa Tucker3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRyan Kelly / Heather Ley vs Shelly Marshall / Kathy Loria2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#4 DoublesStaci Houser / Betsy Hopkins vs Kelley Johnson / Jane Ellis6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-11-09vs LCTA39/Smith/MPRWon 31
W#1 DoublesKasey Hamlin-Smith / Kellyanne Dix vs Manon Mosher / Christiane Jones6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesVirginie Murphy vs Lauren Claypoole5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Ley / Elizabeth Cantey vs Lee Heath / Rosemarie Summers1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesSarah Simmonite / Lisa Kuisel vs Rebecca Adler / Kerry Bennett6-1, 6-1
2025-11-02vs LCTA39/Urbanic/CreeksideLost 13
W#1 DoublesKasey Hamlin-Smith / Rebecca Phelps vs Katherine Pauli / Hannah Holena6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKellyanne Dix / Betsy Hopkins vs Cory Beckham / Meghan Rowland4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Kelly / Virginie Murphy vs Mary Catherine Arthur / Holly Gardner3-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesElizabeth Cantey / Sarah Simmonite vs Ann Anderson / Allison Thomas1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA39/Johnson/Pine Forest000000
2LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR000000
3LCTA39/Davis/Hanahan000000
4LCTA39/Urbanic/Creekside000000
5LCTA39/Webster/ION000000
6LCTA39/Johnson-Evanko/LTP-DI000000
7LCTA39/Smith/MPR000000
8LCTA39/Stuart/Danny Jones000000
9LCTA39/Hoey/LTP-DI000000
10LCTA39/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews000000
11LCTA39/Christopher/CTC000000
12LCTA39/McMahon Koepenick/Wild Dunes000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kasey Hamlin-Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Rebecca Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Betsy Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Susan Cutter
published
3.38
Kellyanne Dix
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Sarah Simmonite
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Maggie Voelkel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heidi Richter
published 3.5
3.13
Heather Ley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Virginie Murphy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Staci Houser
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Lisa Kuisel
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Katie Catalana
published
Katie Donahue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Phelps + Betsy Hopkins7265% games+17.9% vs expected
Rebecca Phelps + Kasey Hamlin-Smith6061% games+7.4% vs expected
Kasey Hamlin-Smith + Betsy Hopkins17762% games+7.0% vs expected
Betsy Hopkins + Katie Donahue5257% games+5.5% vs expected
Heidi Richter + Rebecca Phelps7258% games+4.3% vs expected
Rebecca Phelps + Katie Donahue9262% games+3.2% vs expected
Kellyanne Dix + Betsy Hopkins4456% games+1.7% vs expected
Kellyanne Dix + Kasey Hamlin-Smith15855% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kasey Hamlin-Smith
95W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
Rebecca Phelps
95W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Betsy Hopkins
87W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Susan Cutter
44W–42L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kellyanne Dix
47W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Sarah Simmonite
52W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
Maggie Voelkel
37W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Heidi Richter
20W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Heather Ley
16W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Virginie Murphy
78W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Staci Houser
19W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.92
Lisa Kuisel
24W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Katie Catalana
47W–24L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
Katie Donahue
60W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.