Teams

LCTA39/Urbanic/Creekside

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Sunday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-11-02vs LCTA39/Hopkins/MPRWon 31
L#1 DoublesKatherine Pauli / Hannah Holena vs Kasey Hamlin-Smith / Rebecca Phelps7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCory Beckham / Meghan Rowland vs Kellyanne Dix / Betsy Hopkins6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Catherine Arthur / Holly Gardner vs Ryan Kelly / Virginie Murphy6-3, 6-0
W#4 DoublesAnn Anderson / Allison Thomas vs Elizabeth Cantey / Sarah Simmonite6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 3.5 Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA39/Johnson/Pine Forest000000
2LCTA39/Hopkins/MPR000000
3LCTA39/Davis/Hanahan000000
4LCTA39/Urbanic/Creekside000000
5LCTA39/Webster/ION000000
6LCTA39/Johnson-Evanko/LTP-DI000000
7LCTA39/Smith/MPR000000
8LCTA39/Stuart/Danny Jones000000
9LCTA39/Hoey/LTP-DI000000
10LCTA39/Finneyfrock/St. Andrews000000
11LCTA39/Christopher/CTC000000
12LCTA39/McMahon Koepenick/Wild Dunes000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Katherine Pauli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Hannah Holena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Allison Thomas
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Mary Catherine Arthur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Meghan Rowland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Peggy Urbanic
published
3.15
Kathleen Stein
published
3.15
Ann Anderson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Allie McCrae
published 3.5
3.13
Cory Beckham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Stephanie ONeal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Rowland + Peggy Urbanic5551% games+9.1% vs expected
Mary Catherine Arthur + Katherine Pauli303 matchesnot enough data
Ann Anderson + Kathleen Stein303 matchesnot enough data
Ann Anderson + Peggy Urbanic213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Pauli + Cory Beckham123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Stein + Peggy Urbanic123 matchesnot enough data
Allie McCrae + Cory Beckham213 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Holena + Peggy Urbanic213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Pauli
63W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Hannah Holena
20W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Allison Thomas
16W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Mary Catherine Arthur
46W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Meghan Rowland
17W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Peggy Urbanic
30W–33L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Kathleen Stein
45W–21L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Ann Anderson
32W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Allie McCrae
17W–35L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cory Beckham
50W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
Stephanie ONeal
35W–21L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.