Teams

11-SGraff-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.09 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-02vs 7-LBible-ENOWon 21
L#1 DoublesVirginia Brezac / Allison Taylor vs Loralie Bible / Jonda Young3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Isaacs / Kim Goll vs Jennifer Keeney / Jessica Nagy6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKinsey Wennerstrom / Susan Graff vs Shannon Bartle / Lilie Bonzani6-0, 6-2
2024-10-02vs 5-KNorris-ENOLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Isaacs / Cheryl Smyth vs Sarah Franks / Michelle Trinco2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Beth Dingler vs Lisa Montague / Katie Elder2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Neeley / Allison Taylor vs Hannah White / Christine Gladman3-6, 3-6
2024-09-18vs 1-BBaird-CHTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlison Neeley / Virginia Brezac vs Kelly Jarrett / Mary Carter Taub4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Graff / Lauren Muth Humphreys vs Deb Reisinger / Laurie Droke6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Kristin Isaacs vs Gail Calloway / Christina Deprez6-0, 6-3
2024-09-11vs 6-KRyan-HVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Beth Dingler vs Ruth Caccavale / Deborah Hertzog6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Virginia Brezac vs Joan Mueller / Elizabeth Yancy6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKinsey Wennerstrom / Kristin Isaacs vs Courtney Mangum / Sterling Ingui6-4, 6-1
2024-09-04vs 8-LGilchrist-CHCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Lawrence / Lauren Muth Humphreys vs Cynthia Cross / Jessica Meadows6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Kim Goll vs Christy Lewis / Jennifer Woods3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlison Neeley / Virginia Brezac vs Kara Andrews / Sarah Sapeta3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-21vs 4-GLoFrese-ENOWon 21
L#1 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Kinsey Wennerstrom vs Leslie Jackson / Kellianne White5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesVirginia Brezac / Sara Lawrence vs Alexa Hartenstein / Barbara Wilhelm6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Beth Dingler vs Janet Ranheim / Kerry Espinola6-4, 6-2
2024-08-14vs 10-NDolan-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesKinsey Wennerstrom / Lauren Muth Humphreys vs Dana Okeefe / Ilene Farkas6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Kim Goll vs Anna Wilson / Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Dingler / Virginia Brezac vs Kim Cabelka / Scarlet Dial6-3, 7-5
2024-08-07vs 9-MKuehn-DFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Kinsey Wennerstrom vs Susan Alden / Meta Kuehn5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Abigail Weaver vs Dana McDonald / Danette Pachtner4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKim Goll / Kristin Isaacs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Virginia Brezac
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Lauren Muth Humphreys
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Sara Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.05
Abigail Weaver
published 3
3.03
Kinsey Wennerstrom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Susan Graff
published
2.92
Cheryl Smyth
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.90
Beth Dingler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Kim Goll
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Kristin Isaacs
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Alison Neeley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kinsey Wennerstrom + Susan Graff5158% games+12.1% vs expected
Cheryl Smyth + Kim Goll4350% gamesnot enough data
Kinsey Wennerstrom + Lauren Muth Humphreys6161% gamesnot enough data
Kim Goll + Kristin Isaacs4266% gamesnot enough data
Kari Lovetinsky + Kristin Isaacs2344% gamesnot enough data
Kinsey Wennerstrom + Kristin Isaacs3254% gamesnot enough data
Virginia Brezac + Kim Goll134 matchesnot enough data
Kari Lovetinsky + Alison Neeley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Virginia Brezac
128W–138L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lauren Muth Humphreys
112W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Abigail Weaver
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Kinsey Wennerstrom
127W–103L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Susan Graff
27W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Cheryl Smyth
211W–231L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Beth Dingler
115W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Kim Goll
132W–134L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Kristin Isaacs
111W–164L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Alison Neeley
44W–72L career · 8 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.