Teams

AYTC-Nolan

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-03Won 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Mara Ferrari vs Ellen Johnson / Francisca Lehr7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSue Matyas / Shelley Morrison vs Jolene Momcilovich / Margaret Daniels6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Montgomery / Katharine McKee vs Barbara Kristek / Sara Kuhl6-3, 6-4
2022-06-01Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMara Ferrari / Denise Nolan vs Corliss Liekkio / Janice Hostetler2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Teshima / Debbie Montgomery vs Marilou Rolfe / Susan Fascitelli1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShelley Morrison / Sue Matyas vs Carmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro6-7, 2-6
2022-05-17vs MI-SkoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Mara Ferrari vs Kathy Govier / Adrienne Pierce7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Korch / Judy Teshima vs Ada Ko / Jill Lum3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSue Matyas / Shelley Morrison vs Suzy Skone / Diane Panteleakos6-2, 7-5
2022-05-09Won 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Mara Ferrari vs Patrice Dicasparro / Carmen Almodovar6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelanie Korch / Cheryl Pleas vs Kris Stimpson / Susan Fascitelli4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Montgomery / Sue Matyas vs Karen Dunlop / Corliss Liekkio0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-25Won 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Melanie Korch vs Margaret Daniels / Mary Monroe6-3
W#2 DoublesShelley Morrison / Sue Matyas vs Pamela Elliott / Jolene Momcilovich6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarybeth Alwood / Leona De Rocco vs Carol Rea / Vicki Clark4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-11Won 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Nolan / Melanie Korch vs Kathy Govier / Marian Sinkey6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Pleas / Judy Teshima vs Adrienne Pierce / Anne McGee3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Broecking / Shelley Morrison vs Susan Regan / Diane Panteleakos6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-Dunlop511537118
2AYTC-Nolan5112617154
3HBSQ-Rea2461226195
4MI-Skone0631530199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Mara Ferrari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Debbie Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Sue Matyas
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.55
Denise Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Melanie Korch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Cheryl Pleas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Leona De Rocco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Judy Teshima
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Shelley Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.13
Elizabeth Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Heidi Broecking
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Karen Felton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Marybeth Alwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Korch + Debbie Montgomery9650% games+1.2% vs expected
Debbie Montgomery + Denise Nolan7751% games−1.0% vs expected
Shelley Morrison + Sue Matyas3353% games−5.5% vs expected
Sue Matyas + Denise Nolan2347% games−6.5% vs expected
Sue Matyas + Debbie Montgomery4250% games−8.2% vs expected
Shelley Morrison + Marybeth Alwood6947% gamesnot enough data
Marybeth Alwood + Denise Nolan2548% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Morrison + Denise Nolan0533% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mara Ferrari
312W–180L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Debbie Montgomery
154W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Sue Matyas
196W–147L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Denise Nolan
72W–88L career · 6 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Melanie Korch
79W–111L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Cheryl Pleas
11W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Leona De Rocco
121W–95L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Judy Teshima
34W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Shelley Morrison
43W–51L career · 9 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Elizabeth Franklin
46W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Heidi Broecking
26W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Karen Felton
29W–49L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Marybeth Alwood
39W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.