Teams

SGV Double Trouble-L.Chan-WN/SU10

2022 Mixed Tri Level -18 &Over-San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.28 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesCarlo Bautista / Roselle Paskus vs Paul Scholtz / Stephanie Perry6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCarlo Bautista / Stacey McCoy vs Wenli Chen / Paul Scholtz7-6, 7-6
2022-11-06vs LLW SGV Wild Cards-Tang-WN Su8Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnne Pila / Willie Yeh vs David Lui / Katherine Wu6-7, 2-6
2022-10-23vs SGV Skyline- Chan - WN/SU10Split 11
L#1 DoublesRoseann Harris / Norman Granger vs Tricia Guinto / Jesse Huang2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Pila / Willie Yeh vs Thai Nguyen / Jasmine M Liu6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDavid Luong / Roselle Paskus vs Marcus Liou / Lily Wu6-2, 6-4
2022-10-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Luong / Roselle Paskus vs Amy Liang / Martin Jay Rodiles6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDavid Luong / Roselle Paskus vs Jennifer Avila / Martin Vasquez6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Carlo Bautista
published 4.5
4.22
Stacey McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Amy Ourso
published 4.5
4.08
Roselle Paskus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Roseann Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Anne Pila
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Jermaine Montgomery
published
3.81
Peter Cheng
published
3.80
Karla Garcia
published
Cristine Kim
published 4
Jacob Shin
published 4
3.73
CHIH HAO PAN
published 4
3.52
Lai Chan
published
3.49
Willie Yeh
published
Jeongyean Jang
published
Norman Granger
published
Wesley Wang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carlo Bautista
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Stacey McCoy
145W–88L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Amy Ourso
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Roselle Paskus
101W–105L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Roseann Harris
96W–74L career · 1 line in 2022
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Anne Pila
122W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
Jermaine Montgomery
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%1%99%
3.83
Peter Cheng
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Karla Garcia
2W–18L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.80
4
Cristine Kim
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jacob Shin
1W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
CHIH HAO PAN
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Lai Chan
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Willie Yeh
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Jeongyean Jang
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Norman Granger
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wesley Wang
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.