Teams

SGV Tri-ing Families-Lee-Fremont Park-SA4

2022 Mixed Tri Level -18 &Over-San Gabriel Valley · SGV - 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-20vs LLW SGV Wild Cards-Tang-WN Su8Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNilton Neyra / Ani Aratounians vs Colin Tang / Leticia Alcala2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWonsik Bollmann / Kelly Bollmann vs Priscilla Chieng / Yoshiki Hisamoto4-6, 0-6
2022-10-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesVladimir Abadzhev / Irina Abadzheva vs Jasmine M Liu / Joseph Chan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-10-23vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN-SU10Split 11
L#1 DoublesAni Aratounians / Nilton Neyra vs Amy Liang / Pablo Primucci2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesIrina Abadzheva / Vladimir Abadzhev vs Leslie Jiang / Ted Shen6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVladimir Abadzhev / Irina Abadzheva vs Trenman Yau / Elena Salinas6-2, 6-3
2022-10-16vs SGV Double Trouble-L.Chan-WN/SU10Won 10
W#3 DoublesVladimir Abadzhev / Irina Abadzheva vs Jeongyean Jang / Peter Cheng1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-08vs LLW SGV Wild Cards-Tang-WN Su8Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Bollmann / Wonsik Bollmann vs David Lui / Mercedes Soriano4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesVladimir Abadzhev / Irina Abadzheva vs Bill Michels / Jerri Johnson6-2, 6-2
2022-09-24vs SGV Skyline- Chan - WN/SU10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWonsik Bollmann / Kelly Bollmann vs Javier Rodriguez / Angelica Ramos1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Irina Abadzheva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Lily Wu
published
3.93
Marcus Liou
published
3.56
Vladimir Abadzhev
published
3.51
Kelly Bollmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Wonsik Bollmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Ani Aratounians
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Nilton Neyra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Bollmann + Wonsik Bollmann353350% games−0.4% vs expected
Irina Abadzheva + Vladimir Abadzhev4845% games−5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Irina Abadzheva
234W–146L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
4.03
Lily Wu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
Marcus Liou
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.93
Vladimir Abadzhev
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Kelly Bollmann
73W–87L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Wonsik Bollmann
86W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
4
Ani Aratounians
73W–121L career · 2 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
Nilton Neyra
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.