Teams

1WESS-BROWN Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F3

2023 SEM WINTER MIXED 40 & OVER · 2023 60 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesJohn Altgelt / Jen Myers vs Nina Sober / Bernard MacDonald3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBill Lambert / Margaret Lambert vs Aleksandr Bikhleyzer / Josie Taylor6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Fernandez / Andreas Heesch vs Sheryl Anderson / Kurt Whitehead6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNora Beevers / John Altgelt vs Qasim Hussain / Katherine Ross5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Malin / Andreas Heesch vs David Blackmer / Laura Colbert6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRobert Berry / Jen Myers vs John Walters / Sheryl Anderson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNoah Casser / Denise Fernandez vs Bernard MacDonald / Laura Casey6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJim Komoroski / Agnieszka Palarz vs Jon Muscat / Tracey Batey6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNina Brown / Andreas Heesch vs Sheryl Anderson / Kurt Whitehead5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoah Casser / Denise Fernandez vs Bernard MacDonald / Nina Sober3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAgnieszka Palarz / Jim Komoroski vs Allison Jensen / Jack Jensen6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesRobert Berry / Jen Myers vs Tricia Young / Glen Young3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNora Beevers / John Altgelt vs Amit Newalkar / Sheryl Anderson4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMargaret Lambert / Bill Lambert vs David Blackmer / Laura Colbert2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2023 60 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11WESS-BROWN Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F37116822215
23EAST-MITCHELL Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F253141024200
33LIB-BARDEN Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F153141025180
41PORT-EVENSON Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F253141026212
54TRAVIS-ZIMMERMAN Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F144131127196
64LIFE-ANDERSON Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F33591531237
71LIB-GONZALEZ Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F13591533232
83SCWB-BIKHLEYZER Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F326111328211
92PEACH-HOCH Mixed 40&O 6.0 SEM F22681634228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Agnieszka Palarz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.21
FOUAD BATAH
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Bonnie Treece
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.18
Robert Berry
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Nora Beevers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Jen Myers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.02
Margaret Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Heidi Malin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Craig Halseth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Denise Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Nina Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Noah Casser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
ELISA CARRARO
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Andreas Heesch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bill Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Komoroski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Altgelt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nina Brown + Andreas Heesch3345% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Treece + Robert Berry4252% gamesnot enough data
Agnieszka Palarz + Craig Halseth5077% gamesnot enough data
Craig Halseth + Bonnie Treece404 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Treece + FOUAD BATAH224 matchesnot enough data
Agnieszka Palarz + John Altgelt123 matchesnot enough data
Agnieszka Palarz + Jim Komoroski303 matchesnot enough data
Nina Brown + Robert Berry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Agnieszka Palarz
191W–76L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
3.5
FOUAD BATAH
91W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Bonnie Treece
106W–43L career · 7 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Robert Berry
43W–37L career · 9 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Nora Beevers
68W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Jen Myers
141W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.03
Margaret Lambert
73W–172L career · 2 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Heidi Malin
133W–136L career · 4 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Craig Halseth
40W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Denise Fernandez
64W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Nina Brown
146W–135L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Noah Casser
33W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
3
ELISA CARRARO
106W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Andreas Heesch
48W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Bill Lambert
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Komoroski
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Altgelt
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.