Teams

Double Trouble

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-08vs Team RJT W3.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesMary Crespy vs Susan Hamrock6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-06-05vs Sweet ShotsSplit 11
L#2 SinglesDebra Ciesar vs Miyako Pastor1-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesTianyang Luo / Jennifer Halinski vs Michelle Cole / Charlotte Parris6-0, 6-1
2021-05-22vs Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#2 DoublesTianyang Luo / Debra Ciesar vs Andrea Hallett / Tina Woods3-6, 2-6
2021-05-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDebra Ciesar vs Erin Bannister0-6, 0-6
2021-05-15vs Tennis AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Greenfield / Debra Ciesar vs Andrea Dao / Janice Zima6-7, 3-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Weinberg / Jennifer Booth vs Jenifer Heilig / Beth Kiesner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDebra Ciesar vs Stephanie Clowes6-7, 2-3
2021-05-08Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDebra Ciesar vs Amanda Wenzel0-6, 0-6
2021-05-02vs Get A GripLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Crespy / Debra Beasley vs Diane Schuler / Kristi Nault2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCindy Weinberg vs Jahki Nielsen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Mary Crespy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Jackie Dolan
published 3.5
3.29
Mary Ellen Giuseppe
published
3.25
Mary Grim
published
3.17
Jennifer Halinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Shawn Dalton
published
3.10
Tara MacCall
published
2.95
Cindy Weinberg
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Jann Cassady
published
2.81
Laurie Oberembt
published
2.75
Debra Ciesar
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Julie Ische
published
Laurel Guy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Crespy
111W–50L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Jackie Dolan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
Mary Ellen Giuseppe
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Mary Grim
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jennifer Halinski
61W–70L career · 1 line in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Shawn Dalton
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
Tara MacCall
20W–11L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Cindy Weinberg
42W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
2.95
Jann Cassady
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
2.89
Laurie Oberembt
0W–7L career · no lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
2.81
3
Debra Ciesar
98W–91L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Julie Ische
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laurel Guy
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.