Teams

Sweet Shots

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-07vs Tennis AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesCristina Poli / Brenda Kaechele vs Blanca Shumann / Andrea Dao6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMiyako Pastor vs Page Coleman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-05vs Double TroubleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCristina Poli / Susan Jones vs Laurel Guy / Shawn Dalton4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMiyako Pastor vs Debra Ciesar6-1, 3-5
2021-05-24vs Sassy SmashersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKatina Linkins / Dominique Logsdon vs Elizabeth Clarke / Andrea Hallett6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMiyako Pastor vs Kathleen Leary4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-05-19vs MatchPointLost 02
L#2 DoublesKatina Linkins / Cristina Poli vs Cameron Craig / Millette Miller6-7, 4-5
L#2 SinglesMiyako Pastor vs Natalia Lanteigne3-6, 2-6
2021-05-17vs Between the LinesLost 01
L#2 SinglesMiyako Pastor vs Tana Jankowiak4-6, 3-3
2021-05-08vs Team RJT W3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCristina Poli / Laura Naramore vs Pamela Martin / Valerie Camillo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-02vs Slice of LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelsi Daniell / Cristina Poli vs Alexandra Castleberry / Paige Fishel2-6, 6-7
2021-04-20vs Nadeshiko 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCristina Poli / Dominique Logsdon vs Danielle Frazier / Errin Matechak1-6, 3-6
2021-04-15vs Get A GripLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Brewer / Katina Linkins vs Kristi Nault / Diane Schuler0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Laura Naramore
published
3.44
Yunden Jinsmaa
published
3.40
Cristina Poli
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Brenda Kaechele
published 3.5
3.06
Amy Canavan
published 3.5
2.98
Miyako Pastor
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 46% · published 3
2.67
Charlotte Parris
published 3
2.59
Katina Linkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Susan Jones
published
Alice Browning
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Yunden Jinsmaa
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Cristina Poli
20W–29L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Brenda Kaechele
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Amy Canavan
31W–21L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Miyako Pastor
192W–154L career · 11 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Charlotte Parris
15W–13L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Katina Linkins
48W–124L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
Susan Jones
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.45
Alice Browning
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.