Teams

Team RJT W3.5

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-08vs Double TroubleLost 02
L#2 DoublesNell Koopman / Stephanie Peebles vs Jennifer Booth / Mary Ellen Giuseppe3-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesZahira Vargas / Lisa Means vs Julie Ische / Laurie Oberembt3-6, 2-6
2021-06-05vs Slice of LoveLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Hopkins / Lisa Means vs Holly McMullen / Jill White2-6, 1-6
2021-05-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Peebles / Susan Slinkard vs Sachi Pilkenton / Regina Famiglietti4-6, 4-5
2021-05-19vs Get A GripLost 01
L#3 DoublesZahira Vargas / Lisa Means vs Leslie-Anne Levy / Elizabeth Marcotte6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2021-05-10Won 20
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Lisa Means vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Peebles / Zahira Vargas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-01vs Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Means / Jamie Rothenberger vs Elizabeth Clarke / Tina Woods2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Edie Ashton
published 4
3.37
Susan Slinkard
published
3.30
Christine Hopkins
published 3.5
3.30
Alexis Martin
published 3.5
3.23
Valerie Camillo
published
2.97
Stephanie Peebles
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Lisa Means
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Nell Koopman
published
Paula Cotman
published
Susan Hamrock
published
Zahira Vargas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edie Ashton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Slinkard
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Christine Hopkins
10W–21L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Alexis Martin
24W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Valerie Camillo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Stephanie Peebles
124W–100L career · 9 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Lisa Means
46W–131L career · 10 lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.94
Nell Koopman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Paula Cotman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Hamrock
10W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zahira Vargas
1W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.