Teams

HMTC RED

2025 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-30vs MLF BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Olson / Diane Westlind vs Mary Wedum / Pat Athey6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMel Fernandez / Judy O'Gorman vs Adrienne LeBailly / Sara Mullarkey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCimarron Spitz / Mary Jane Bartley vs Betty Gonzales / Susan Davidson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-23vs LVTA TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesCimarron Spitz / Mary Jane Bartley vs Marcia Linley / Trudy McCraken7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Trish Lebsack vs Michele MacHado / Debra Olson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Olson / Diane Westlind vs Lesli Bruden / Karen Pielin6-1, 6-3
2025-07-16vs CSU GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Cimarron Spitz vs Lisa Olsen / Karen Dunbar3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Jane Bartley / Mel Fernandez vs Konnie Kosek / Leticia Dunn2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Colleen Muhlbradt vs Mary Gabiola / Karen Johnson6-1, 6-0
2025-07-09vs MLF BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesMel Fernandez / Judy O'Gorman vs Joyce Hirano-Kuznik / Janet Crespin5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Nancy Williams vs Debora J Miller / Jean Tonoli3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBecky Olson / Diane Westlind vs Betty Gonzales / Susan Davidson5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-02vs LVTA TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Nancy Williams vs Karen Pielin / Marcia Linley7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Colleen Muhlbradt vs Trudy McCraken / Sue Schneider6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCimarron Spitz / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Michele MacHado / Lesli Bruden6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-25vs CSU GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMel Fernandez / Nancy Williams vs Janet Gugliotto / Melissa King5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Adsit / Colleen Muhlbradt vs Kelly Day / Jane Gronewoller6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Berkheim / Trish Lebsack vs Leticia Dunn / Konnie Kosek0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HMTC RED5114414148
2LVTA TEAL0611735223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Trish Lebsack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Colleen Muhlbradt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Becky Olson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Mel Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Judy O'Gorman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Cimarron Spitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Teresa Adsit
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.94
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.67
Diane Westlind
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Linda Berkheim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mary Jane Bartley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy O'Gorman + Nancy Pflughoeft3746% games−3.7% vs expected
Teresa Adsit + Cimarron Spitz91743% games−4.2% vs expected
Trish Lebsack + Colleen Muhlbradt1543% games−4.9% vs expected
Judy O'Gorman + Mel Fernandez7155% games−4.9% vs expected
Teresa Adsit + Nancy Pflughoeft4741% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Adsit + Colleen Muhlbradt5259% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Adsit + Trish Lebsack5071% gamesnot enough data
Cimarron Spitz + Nancy Pflughoeft2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Trish Lebsack
63W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Colleen Muhlbradt
109W–92L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Becky Olson
5W–8L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Mel Fernandez
41W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Judy O'Gorman
58W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Cimarron Spitz
50W–114L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Teresa Adsit
81W–107L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Diane Westlind
57W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Linda Berkheim
48W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Mary Jane Bartley
22W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.