Teams

LCTA18/Tunick/Park West

USTA 18 & over Tri-Level · 18 & Over 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-27vs LCTA18/Anderson-Leahy/I’OnLost 03
L#1 DoublesMindy Spring / Courtney Buley vs Antonia Fokas / Vanessa Hinson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYulia Misciagna / Paige Hall vs Kim ONeill / Christyn Lansing2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNeda Smith / Laura Brinson vs Anna-Liese Anderson / Emily Calcagno3-6, 4-6
2025-06-20vs LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St. AndrewsLost 02
L#1 DoublesYulia Misciagna / Sylvia Delsalto vs Patricia Schuster / Christine Williams1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Tunick / Paige Hall vs Leanne Sullivan / Suzie Zhang2-6, 0-6
2025-06-13vs LCTA18/Ryan-Coleman/MaybankLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Tunick / Mindy Spring vs Lindsay Milo / Elizabeth Stevens0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSylvia Delsalto / Kimberly Ring vs Halley Cella / Kelsey Barlow4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Shellnutt / Laura Brinson vs Bethany Britton / Gabrielle Milo4-6, 4-6
2025-06-06vs LCTA18/Biggs/MPRDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCourtney Buley / Susan Cutter vs Lori Cameron / Viktoria Payne2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Miller / Kimberly Shellnutt vs TRACY ROGERS / Carly Hara3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 3.5 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Rebecca Ambrose
published
3.41
Courtney Buley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Julie Hendrix
published
3.38
Susan Cutter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Nicola Swanson
published
3.27
Christine Tunick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Sylvia Delsalto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Alise McCormack
published 3.5
3.23
Kimberly Ring
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Yulia Misciagna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Erika Colbrunn
published
3.13
Mindy Spring
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Paige Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Neda Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Kimberly Shellnutt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Cece Fraunfelter
published 3
Cynthia Miller
published 3
2.68
Cindy Newman
published 3
2.65
Laura Brinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Jennifer McCool
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yulia Misciagna + Nicola Swanson7258% games+9.8% vs expected
Erika Colbrunn + Nicola Swanson5067% games+8.0% vs expected
Erika Colbrunn + Yulia Misciagna8754% games+6.9% vs expected
Erika Colbrunn + Christine Tunick9555% games+4.9% vs expected
Nicola Swanson + Sylvia Delsalto3547% games+2.3% vs expected
Kimberly Ring + Rebecca Ambrose6154% games+1.0% vs expected
Christine Tunick + Nicola Swanson291158% games−0.1% vs expected
Cindy Newman + Cynthia Miller7851% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Ambrose
88W–61L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Courtney Buley
17W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
Julie Hendrix
28W–51L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Susan Cutter
44W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Nicola Swanson
68W–38L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Christine Tunick
86W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sylvia Delsalto
88W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Alise McCormack
54W–53L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kimberly Ring
56W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Yulia Misciagna
53W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Erika Colbrunn
54W–52L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Mindy Spring
53W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Paige Hall
23W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Neda Smith
86W–81L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Kimberly Shellnutt
51W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cece Fraunfelter
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cynthia Miller
41W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Newman
31W–40L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Laura Brinson
37W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Jennifer McCool
79W–101L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.