Teams

NITA S 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth

2024 NITA3 Summer Adult 55 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-29vs NITA S 70W55e Challenge-SharpWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Leto / Barbara Kleinschmidt vs Suzi Feliciano / Laura Fausey7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDana Bursch / Julie Roth vs Denise Rippetoe-Reed / Ajita Chander7-6, 3-2
W#3 DoublesMarisa Mancini / Pam Kuchan vs Joy Mullady / Eileen Gillstrom6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-15vs NITA S 70W55c Rush Copley-AdamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet Trimble / Lisa Ventrella vs Gail Wolf / Lisa Korte3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHolly Kost / Marisa Mancini vs Mary Baker / Nancy Williford6-7, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeanine Janzen / Wendy Leto vs Sharon Martinez / Cathy Albrecht2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-07-08vs NITA S 70W55a Naperville-BianchiLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Ventrella / Janet Trimble vs Wendy L Flynn / Marie Hajduk7-6, 3-1
L#2 DoublesPam Kuchan / Marisa Mancini vs Stephanie Batka / Denise McKenna4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Roth / Barbara Kleinschmidt vs Margaret McAndrews / Lesa Moskowitz6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJulie Roth / Lisa Ventrella vs Nancy Sherman / Julie Moss6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarisa Mancini / Holly Kost vs Teresa Hunter / Teri Berger6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeanine Janzen / Pam Kuchan vs Donna McAlister / Elizabeth Michael7-5, 6-1
2024-06-13vs NITA S 70W55b Wheaton-OhlsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesVanessa Clohessy / Vilia Dedinas vs Laura King / Marcia Gregory6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDana Bursch / Christine Esler vs Carla Rhoads / Karen McClure6-4, 4-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Ventrella / Marisa Mancini vs Kara Bittner / Janice Ohlson6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesVanessa Clohessy / Vilia Dedinas vs Lynn Park / Christine Lee2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJanet Trimble / Holly Kost vs Elizabeth Sheridan / Tracy Reese6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarisa Mancini / Julie Roth vs Norma Ericson / Marjorie Bogdalek6-7, 3-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA Summer Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 70W55a Naperville-Bianchi601627126
2NITA S 70W55g Naperville-Sheridan/Ruden511449115
3NITA S 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth3310819168
4NITA S 70W55c Rush Copley-Adams3381021164
5NITA S 70W55e Challenge-Sharp2471124159
6NITA S 70W55b Wheaton-Ohlson1541429183
7NITA S 70W55f Vaughan-Sherman/Jirsa1541430192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Wendy Leto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.29
Dana Bursch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Vilia Dedinas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Christine Esler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Janet Trimble
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Lisa Ventrella
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Barbara Kleinschmidt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Colette Pinter
published 3
Holly Kost
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanine Janzen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Roth
published
Marisa Mancini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pam Kuchan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vanessa Clohessy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Leto + Barbara Kleinschmidt6158% games+5.9% vs expected
Wendy Leto + Jeanine Janzen7752% games+0.5% vs expected
Lisa Ventrella + Janet Trimble1541% games−12.8% vs expected
Vanessa Clohessy + Vilia Dedinas3848% gamesnot enough data
Pam Kuchan + Marisa Mancini6450% gamesnot enough data
Julie Roth + Barbara Kleinschmidt5351% gamesnot enough data
Janet Trimble + Vilia Dedinas3446% gamesnot enough data
Holly Kost + Janet Trimble1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Wendy Leto
109W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Dana Bursch
46W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Vilia Dedinas
111W–109L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christine Esler
143W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Janet Trimble
86W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Lisa Ventrella
58W–72L career · 4 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Barbara Kleinschmidt
95W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Colette Pinter
32W–65L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Holly Kost
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeanine Janzen
71W–88L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Roth
74W–51L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marisa Mancini
21W–15L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pam Kuchan
28W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vanessa Clohessy
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.