Teams

NITA S 80MX40a TAM (Marberry/Sung)

2022 NITA3 Summer Mixed 40 & Over · NITA Summer Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Chuck Blumenthal vs Lisa Korte / Lucas Boyer3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSilvia Kusaka / Bruce Thornquist vs Marilyn Tansey / Kevin Podwika6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Grady / Paul Leonardo vs Penny Knapik / Andrew Balzer3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBruce Thornquist / Sara Marberry vs John Laurx / Penny Knapik6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChuck Blumenthal / Alison Donnelly vs Kevin Moffitt / Catherine Grover2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSara Marberry / Bruce Thornquist vs Christine Meade / James Brown2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHuan Chang / El Cid Balitaan vs Alyson Dorfman / Charles Schinzer6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Rust / SEAN YANG vs Allison Goldberg / Allen Goodman4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJennifer Grady / Chuck Blumenthal vs Priscilla Ewaldz / Stephen Ewaldz6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKim Rust / Young Choi vs Randy Curtis / Christine Meade6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPatricia Bustamante / Eric Matten vs John Li / Ann Park1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesBruce Thornquist / Dawn Baumann vs Sue Christianson / Michael Downes6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChuck Blumenthal / Silvia Kusaka vs Priscilla Ewaldz / Stephen Ewaldz3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEric Matten / Emily Paris vs Allison Goldberg / Randy Curtis7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSara Marberry / Bruce Thornquist vs Debbi Landorf / Deniz Karacay6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlison Donnelly / El Cid Balitaan vs Kevin Moffitt / Stacey Dohman6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSara Marberry / SEAN YANG vs Sue Christianson / Michael Downes7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Paris / Eric Matten vs Sophia Koliatsis / John Li2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesHuan Chang / Young Choi vs Christine Meade / Joseph Lyden6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesSara Marberry / Joon Sung vs Lisa Korte / Deniz Karacay2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NITA Summer Mixed 40 & Over 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 80MX40a TAM (Marberry/Sung)7117721203
2NITA S 80MX40b Naperville TC (Podwika)44111331217
3NITA S 80MX40c Racquet Club of LB (Cal/Goldberg)1781633220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Huan Chang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.95
Dawn Baumann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Lesley Seeger
published
3.87
Joon Sung
published
3.87
Silvia Kusaka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Alison Donnelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.78
Bruce Thornquist
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Emily Paris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Patricia Bustamante
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Paul Leonardo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Chuck Blumenthal
published 4
3.51
El Cid Balitaan
published 4
3.44
SEAN YANG
published
3.34
Lisa Hans
published
Eric Matten
published
Jennifer Grady
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Rust
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sara Marberry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Huan Chang + Chuck Blumenthal9554% games+6.1% vs expected
Sara Marberry + Bruce Thornquist111249% games−13.2% vs expected
Lesley Seeger + Joon Sung14167% gamesnot enough data
Silvia Kusaka + El Cid Balitaan3450% gamesnot enough data
Sara Marberry + Joon Sung1544% gamesnot enough data
Silvia Kusaka + Joon Sung3354% gamesnot enough data
Sara Marberry + Chuck Blumenthal4153% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Seeger + Chuck Blumenthal2354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Huan Chang
201W–143L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
Lesley Seeger
39W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
Joon Sung
91W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4.5
Alison Donnelly
119W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Bruce Thornquist
238W–98L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Emily Paris
70W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Patricia Bustamante
123W–102L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Paul Leonardo
91W–64L career · 1 line in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Chuck Blumenthal
50W–42L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
El Cid Balitaan
21W–18L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
SEAN YANG
13W–17L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
Lisa Hans
71W–103L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.34
Eric Matten
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Grady
78W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Rust
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Marberry
124W–87L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.