Teams

Rock Springs (Pam Williams)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesLori D'Adamio / Chris Dalrymple vs Nan Lusins / Grace Rapp4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatty Bettencourt / Nancy Nash vs Rita Daniels / Jan Hardwick6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStewart Mary Jo / Pam Williams vs Laura Estep / Beth Hensley6-4, 6-2
2026-02-17vs Four Seasons (Janet King)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesPatty Bettencourt / Nancy Nash vs Nancy Willard / Christine Locke6-2, 3-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTracy Cavaness / Michele Gregory vs Mindy Barber / Becky Solomon6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLori D'Adamio / Chris Dalrymple vs Janet King / Janet Pridgen6-2, 6-2
2026-02-12vs Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesPatty Bettencourt / Lori D'Adamio vs Kim J King / Regina Walker6-4, 1-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTracy Cavaness / Michele Gregory vs Angela Engram / Gayle Weaks6-4, 5-7, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChris Dalrymple / Sherri Brown vs Cathy Hampton / Faye Smith6-4, 6-2
2026-01-28vs USTA Atlanta/Kimberly ChastainLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatty Bettencourt / Lori D'Adamio vs Aida Kelley / Karen Miller6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDiana Stout / Lori Warren vs Kimberly Chastain / Bonnie Sikorski6-2, 1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Gregory / Tracy Cavaness vs Brenda Duggan / Toni Pastoric5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesPatty Bettencourt / Chris Dalrymple vs Jane Buturff / Kathy Mayhew6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Ashwood / Lori D'Adamio vs Barbara Beirne / Adrienne Marting6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichele Gregory / Pam Williams vs Judith Fulk / Della Twite4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-14vs Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesPatty Bettencourt / Randi Nelson vs Glennis Westbrook / Jan Hardwick6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichelle Ashwood / Lori D'Adamio vs Terry Aiello / Laura Estep6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesStewart Mary Jo / Diana Stout vs Beth Hensley / Grace Rapp3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Diana Stout
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.05
Patty Bettencourt
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.04
Tracy Cavaness
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Chris Dalrymple
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.02
Michelle Ashwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Lori D'Adamio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Nancy Nash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Randi Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Lori Warren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Stewart Mary Jo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Michele Gregory
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Sherri Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Debbie Underwood
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Bettencourt + Randi Nelson5073% games+20.6% vs expected
Patty Bettencourt + Nancy Nash7163% games+8.7% vs expected
Nancy Nash + Stewart Mary Jo8262% games+6.8% vs expected
Michelle Ashwood + Lori D'Adamio8361% games+6.3% vs expected
Patty Bettencourt + Michele Gregory4163% games+6.0% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Michelle Ashwood4353% games+2.1% vs expected
Chris Dalrymple + Lori D'Adamio3652% games−4.9% vs expected
Nancy Nash + Michele Gregory2441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diana Stout
27W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.08
Patty Bettencourt
46W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Tracy Cavaness
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Chris Dalrymple
44W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Michelle Ashwood
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lori D'Adamio
43W–45L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Nancy Nash
62W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Randi Nelson
28W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Lori Warren
20W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Stewart Mary Jo
29W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Michele Gregory
67W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Sherri Brown
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Debbie Underwood
13W–31L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.