Teams

Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-18vs Four Seasons (Janet King)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesDianna Kelly / Debra Ward vs Nancy Willard / Janet Pridgen4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRegina Walker / Arlene Reese vs Anne Haddox / Becky Solomon6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJanelle Blasingame / Erica Weaver vs Cheryl Brussow / Wanda Loggins4-6, 6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJanelle Blasingame / Dianna Kelly vs Barbara Pasko / Adrienne Marting5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Bowers / Lisa Bacote vs Barbara Beirne / Mary Younie5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKimberly Trent / Debra Ward vs Judith Fulk / Debra Lanham7-5, 6-2
2026-02-12vs Rock Springs (Pam Williams)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKim J King / Regina Walker vs Patty Bettencourt / Lori D'Adamio4-6, 6-1, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAngela Engram / Gayle Weaks vs Tracy Cavaness / Michele Gregory4-6, 7-5, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCathy Hampton / Faye Smith vs Chris Dalrymple / Sherri Brown4-6, 2-6
2026-01-28vs Four Seasons (Janet King)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesArlene Reese / Kimberly Trent vs Nancy Willard / Janet Pridgen1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Engram / Regina Walker vs Phyllis Dartt / Wanda Loggins6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Hampton / Gayle Weaks vs Janet King / Mindy Barber7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-01-21vs Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesGayle Weaks / Erica Weaver vs Terry Aiello / Jan Hardwick6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKim J King / Regina Walker vs Rita Daniels / Grace Rapp6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngela Engram / Faye Smith vs Beth Hensley / Nancy Hoskins6-2, 6-3
2026-01-14vs USTA Atlanta/Kimberly ChastainSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim J King / Lisa Bacote vs Karen Potts / Bonnie Sikorski4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesArlene Reese / Erica Weaver vs Renee Bullard / Kimberly Chastain6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Kimberly Chastain601449130
2USTA Atlanta/Kim Barnes5112617174
3Life Time Peachtree Corners (Julia Connor)*4210819178
4Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)*429921181
5Harrison (Karen Christian)*3381022175
6The Georgian Resort (Kristi Smith)*339922188
7Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*2410820166
8Jefferson Township (Susan Rasmussen)*2461227193
9Four Seasons (Janet King)*1551326206
10Fowler Park (Laura Dodd)*1561227199
11Village of Deaton Creek (Adrienne Marting)*0631531216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Annie Canty
published 3
2.98
Arlene Reese
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Janelle Blasingame
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Cathy Hampton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Dianna Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Debra Ward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Kim J King
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Gayle Weaks
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Kimberly Trent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Erica Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Andrea Bowers
published 3
2.74
Faye Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Angela Engram
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Holly Dietrick
published
2.49
Lisa Bacote
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Regina Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arlene Reese + Janelle Blasingame20660% games+10.2% vs expected
Cathy Hampton + Faye Smith6648% games−0.9% vs expected
Kimberly Trent + Debra Ward4254% games−5.6% vs expected
Gayle Weaks + Kim J King303 matchesnot enough data
Annie Canty + Holly Dietrick303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Bacote + Kim J King213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annie Canty
16W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Arlene Reese
51W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Janelle Blasingame
32W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Cathy Hampton
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Dianna Kelly
18W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Debra Ward
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Kim J King
27W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Gayle Weaks
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Kimberly Trent
20W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Erica Weaver
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Andrea Bowers
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Faye Smith
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Angela Engram
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Holly Dietrick
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Lisa Bacote
5W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Regina Walker
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.