Teams

The Georgian Resort (Kristi Smith)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-25vs Harrison (Karen Christian)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Najar / Betty Bill vs Elizabeth Hardin / Jeanie Posey3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Denney / Susan Cribb vs Karen Christian / Therese Clark6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristy Bowen / Cassandra Cleland vs Edie Cox / Karen Pelt5-7, 0-6
2026-02-18vs USTA Atlanta/Kim BarnesLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeidi Harris / Michelle Najar vs Patrice Chishom / Jeanne Linkul6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTammy Watts / Betty Bill vs Tracy Warech / Leticia Fernandez4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSue Stovall / Cassandra Cleland vs Mali Hu / Lisa Landau1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSue Stovall / Michelle Najar vs Lucy Evans / Marian Lochry6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTammy Watts / Ann Wood vs Julia Connor / Pamela Gross4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Harris / Velida Turner vs Janet Feeley / Lisa Haynor6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-28vs Fowler Park (Laura Dodd)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristi Smith / Sue Stovall vs Debbie Yancey / Patricia Martinez6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Harris / Susan Cribb vs Desiree Blake / Elaine Wood6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTamara Smith / Velida Turner vs Jeramie Gibson / Diana Lokey6-3, 6-2
2026-01-21vs Fowler Park (Kim Gillon)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Najar / Sue Stovall vs Robin Johnson / Everely Lawrence6-3, 3-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Cribb / Ann Wood vs Wanda Grant / Nina Day6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTammy Denney / Tamara Smith vs Gayle Bryan / Kathleen Petro1-6, 6-3, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMichelle Najar / Kristi Smith vs Donna Schaaf / Sally Smith6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristy Bowen / Tammy Watts vs Linda McDaniel / Susan Rasmussen2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBetty Bill / Heidi Harris vs Alice Bell / Deborah Shields6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Kimberly Chastain601449130
2USTA Atlanta/Kim Barnes5112617174
3Life Time Peachtree Corners (Julia Connor)*4210819178
4Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)*429921181
5Harrison (Karen Christian)*3381022175
6The Georgian Resort (Kristi Smith)*339922188
7Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*2410820166
8Jefferson Township (Susan Rasmussen)*2461227193
9Four Seasons (Janet King)*1551326206
10Fowler Park (Laura Dodd)*1561227199
11Village of Deaton Creek (Adrienne Marting)*0631531216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Velida Turner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Heidi Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Teresa Greenwood
published
2.98
Sue Stovall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Tammy Denney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Betty Bill
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Michelle Najar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Tammy Watts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Susan Cribb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ann Wood
published 3
2.65
Christy Bowen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.43
Cassandra Cleland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kristi Smith
published
Tamara Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Stovall + Teresa Greenwood18560% games+6.9% vs expected
Sue Stovall + Heidi Harris5256% games+5.2% vs expected
Betty Bill + Teresa Greenwood8267% games+4.5% vs expected
Tammy Denney + Heidi Harris5548% games+3.6% vs expected
Sue Stovall + Velida Turner5652% games+0.9% vs expected
Tammy Watts + Teresa Greenwood2352% games−3.0% vs expected
Tammy Watts + Tammy Denney314 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Denney + Sue Stovall224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Velida Turner
88W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Heidi Harris
29W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Teresa Greenwood
72W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Sue Stovall
83W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
2.98
Tammy Denney
30W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Betty Bill
42W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Michelle Najar
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Tammy Watts
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Susan Cribb
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Ann Wood
31W–32L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Christy Bowen
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Cassandra Cleland
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.43
Kristi Smith
10W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tamara Smith
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.