Teams

Harrison (Karen Christian)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hardin / Jeanie Posey vs Michelle Najar / Betty Bill6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Christian / Therese Clark vs Tammy Denney / Susan Cribb4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdie Cox / Karen Pelt vs Christy Bowen / Cassandra Cleland7-5, 6-0
2026-02-23vs Fowler Park (Kim Gillon)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Christian / Jeanie Posey vs Wanda Grant / Janet Sadler-Akers4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBarbara Gohlinghorst / Joyce Kime vs Everely Lawrence / Diana Foregger1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Magee / Karen Martinez vs Nina Day / Victoria Hughes3-6, 1-6
2026-02-18vs Fowler Park (Laura Dodd)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesJeanie Posey / Elizabeth Hardin vs Debbie Yancey / Kaye Stanzione6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Lindberg / Edie Cox vs Denise Brobson / Elizabeth Ortiz6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Woodward / Brenda Magee vs Maxine Russack / Laura Dodd6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hardin / Jeanie Posey vs Barbara Coskrey / Gina Vines-Clemans6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Lindberg / Edie Cox vs Susan Rasmussen / Linda McDaniel1-6, 3-6
2026-01-21vs USTA Atlanta/Kim BarnesLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeanie Posey / Ann Woodward vs Patrice Chishom / Jeanne Linkul0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEdie Cox / Susan Lindberg vs Gemma Verna / Kim Barnes4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoyce Kime / Barbara Gohlinghorst vs Mali Hu / Lisa Landau0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Lindberg / Edie Cox vs Marian Lochry / Janet Feeley6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTherese Clark / Jeanie Posey vs Lucy Evans / Deborah Pantina6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrenda Magee / Barbara Gohlinghorst vs Julia Connor / Cheri Maiorano1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Kimberly Chastain601449130
2USTA Atlanta/Kim Barnes5112617174
3Life Time Peachtree Corners (Julia Connor)*4210819178
4Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)*429921181
5Harrison (Karen Christian)*3381022175
6The Georgian Resort (Kristi Smith)*339922188
7Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*2410820166
8Jefferson Township (Susan Rasmussen)*2461227193
9Four Seasons (Janet King)*1551326206
10Fowler Park (Laura Dodd)*1561227199
11Village of Deaton Creek (Adrienne Marting)*0631531216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Edie Cox
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Lori Cybulskis
published
2.88
Jeanie Posey
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.84
Elizabeth Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ann Woodward
published 3
2.70
Barbara Gohlinghorst
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Therese Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Karen Pelt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Brenda Magee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Joyce Kime
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Martinez
published
Susan Lindberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edie Cox + Susan Lindberg231057% games+4.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Hardin + Barbara Gohlinghorst4447% games−1.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Hardin + Jeanie Posey271852% games−1.6% vs expected
Brenda Magee + Lori Cybulskis41242% games−2.5% vs expected
Karen Pelt + Therese Clark4644% games−6.2% vs expected
Brenda Magee + Susan Lindberg3450% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Gohlinghorst + Jeanie Posey044 matchesnot enough data
Ann Woodward + Joyce Kime123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edie Cox
50W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Lori Cybulskis
30W–64L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jeanie Posey
46W–45L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Elizabeth Hardin
57W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Ann Woodward
20W–38L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Barbara Gohlinghorst
26W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Therese Clark
34W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Karen Pelt
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Brenda Magee
13W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Joyce Kime
8W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Karen Martinez
17W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Lindberg
49W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.