Teams

USTA Atlanta/Kimberly Chastain

USTA Atlanta Winter - 55 & Over Women · 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesAida Kelley / Karen Miller vs Linda Ward / Adrienne Marting6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRenee Bullard / Patsy Kilmartin vs Audrey Kugler / Barbara Beirne6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKeri Beck / Kimberly Chastain vs Susan Teel / Della Twite6-1, 6-0
2026-02-12vs Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesConstance Aldredge / Connie Bowns vs Terry Aiello / Jan Hardwick3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Chastain / Brenda Duggan vs Grace Rapp / Nancy Hoskins6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Potts / Karen Miller vs Laura Estep / Beth Hensley6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesKeri Beck / Kimberly Chastain vs Jane Buturff / Kathy Mayhew6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRenee Bullard / Patsy Kilmartin vs Judith Fulk / Audrey Kugler6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesConstance Aldredge / Aida Kelley vs Debra Lanham / Della Twite6-2, 6-3
2026-01-28vs Rock Springs (Pam Williams)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesAida Kelley / Karen Miller vs Patty Bettencourt / Lori D'Adamio1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Chastain / Bonnie Sikorski vs Diana Stout / Lori Warren2-6, 6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrenda Duggan / Toni Pastoric vs Michele Gregory / Tracy Cavaness7-5, 6-2
2026-01-21vs Four Seasons (Janet King)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Miller / Karen Potts vs Christine Locke / Nancy Willard6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKimberly Chastain / Patsy Kilmartin vs Phyllis Dartt / Wanda Loggins4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrenda Duggan / Toni Pastoric vs Janet King / Diane McIntosh6-2, 6-2
2026-01-14vs Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)*Split 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Potts / Bonnie Sikorski vs Kim J King / Lisa Bacote6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRenee Bullard / Kimberly Chastain vs Arlene Reese / Erica Weaver1-6, 2-6
2023-11-08vs Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesJan Myers / Karen Potts vs Terry Aiello / Pam Autrey7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrenda Duggan / Toni Pastoric vs Glennis Westbrook / Nancy Hoskins6-0, 7-5
2023-10-18vs Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Potts / Julie Turner vs Beth Hensley / Laura Estep6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Kimberly Chastain601449130
2USTA Atlanta/Kim Barnes5112617174
3Life Time Peachtree Corners (Julia Connor)*4210819178
4Sugar Creek (Janelle Blasingame)*429921181
5Harrison (Karen Christian)*3381022175
6The Georgian Resort (Kristi Smith)*339922188
7Rhodes Jordan (Nancy Hoskins)*2410820166
8Jefferson Township (Susan Rasmussen)*2461227193
9Four Seasons (Janet King)*1551326206
10Fowler Park (Laura Dodd)*1561227199
11Village of Deaton Creek (Adrienne Marting)*0631531216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Karen Potts
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Renee Bullard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Patsy Kilmartin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Constance Aldredge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Aida Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Bonnie Sikorski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Toni Pastoric
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Brenda Duggan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Keri Beck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Connie Bowns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Bullard + Patsy Kilmartin10260% games+5.9% vs expected
Brenda Duggan + Toni Pastoric7647% games−7.3% vs expected
Karen Potts + Brenda Duggan4166% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Sikorski + Patsy Kilmartin213 matchesnot enough data
Constance Aldredge + Toni Pastoric123 matchesnot enough data
Aida Kelley + Connie Bowns123 matchesnot enough data
Keri Beck + Connie Bowns123 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Duggan + Connie Bowns033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Potts
36W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Renee Bullard
63W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Patsy Kilmartin
47W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Constance Aldredge
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Aida Kelley
25W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Bonnie Sikorski
71W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Toni Pastoric
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Brenda Duggan
26W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Keri Beck
10W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Connie Bowns
21W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.