Teams

3LIB-STPIERRE AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F1

2024 SEM ADULT 55 & OVER NIGHT MEN · 7.0 MEN TUES PM SEM

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesPatrick Haley / Michael Wynn vs Michael Tran / Howard Scheps6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Sitz / Barry St Pierre vs John Weiss / Steve Eder6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerry Bowman / Jeff Hill vs Michael Coffey / Christopher White3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesTim Atkinson / Joe Pisto vs James McKenzie / Rocco Pisto0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesPatrick Haley / Michael Wynn vs Rick Mintz / David Konkle4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatrick Lee / David Sitz vs Michael Tran / Steve Eder6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Hill / Terry Bowman vs Christopher White / Manuel Ayres6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJoe Pisto / Gregory Ensing vs James McKenzie / Rocco Pisto3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatrick Haley / Michael Wynn vs August Meyers / Clarence Lewis6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Haffey / Barry St Pierre vs Bruce Shields / Tae-Hwa Chun4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesPatrick Haley / Michael Wynn vs Michael Tran / Howard Scheps6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarry St Pierre / Josh Kerst vs Joseph Devereaux / Manuel Ayres6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTim Atkinson / Gregory Ensing vs Michael Coffey / David White3-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesJosh Kerst / Patrick Lee vs Rocco Pisto / James McKenzie4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Wynn / David Sitz vs Sean Grant / Tae-Hwa Chun6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTerry Bowman / Jeff Hill vs Thomas Belcher / Clarence Lewis6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Haley / Michael Wynn vs Steve Eder / John Weiss6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatrick Lee / David Sitz vs David White / Ramon Gallardo6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGregory Ensing / Barry St Pierre vs James Feustel / Joseph Devereaux6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesPatrick Haley / Michael Wynn vs James McKenzie / Rocco Pisto2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Lee / David Sitz vs Sean Grant / Thomas Belcher6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichael Haffey / Barry St Pierre vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0 MEN TUES PM SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14FAC-HORNE AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F27223414149
23LIB-STPIERRE AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F16215920179
31BOH-VONDELL AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F263141331244
41HV-SHIELDS AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F144141024218
53EAST-KOZIK AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F245111636263
64VTC-inside-FEUSTEL AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F12671736249
72DEER-JENNETT AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F21862144292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
David Sitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Terry Bowman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Michael Haffey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Gregory Ensing
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Barry St Pierre
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Jeff Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Dickinson
published
Joe Pisto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Kerst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Wynn
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Patrick Haley
published
Tim Atkinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Wynn + Barry St Pierre2542% games+0.4% vs expected
Jeff Hill + Gregory Ensing1446% gamesnot enough data
Barry St Pierre + Michael Haffey1434% gamesnot enough data
Barry St Pierre + Gregory Ensing3252% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Haley + Barry St Pierre134 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Hill + Terry Bowman213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Hill + Barry St Pierre033 matchesnot enough data
David Sitz + Terry Bowman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Sitz
90W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Terry Bowman
54W–92L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Michael Haffey
15W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Gregory Ensing
29W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Barry St Pierre
107W–165L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Jeff Hill
30W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
David Dickinson
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joe Pisto
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Josh Kerst
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Wynn
65W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Haley
24W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Atkinson
24W–31L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.