Teams

1HV-SHIELDS AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F1

2024 SEM ADULT 55 & OVER NIGHT MEN · 7.0 MEN TUES PM SEM

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesTae-Hwa Chun / Sean Grant vs Rick Mintz / David Konkle2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBruce Shields / Robert Tinney vs Michael Tran / John Weiss6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Belcher / Clarence Lewis vs James Feustel / Manuel Ayres6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJames McKenzie / Rocco Pisto vs Tim Atkinson / Joe Pisto6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDouglas Quint / Robert Tinney vs Patrick Haley / Patrick Lee3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesJames McKenzie / Rocco Pisto vs Rick Mintz / David Konkle6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSean Grant / Thomas Belcher vs Steve Eder / Michael Coffey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Tinney / Douglas Quint vs Joseph Devereaux / James Feustel6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJames McKenzie / Rocco Pisto vs Joe Pisto / Gregory Ensing6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAugust Meyers / Clarence Lewis vs Patrick Haley / Michael Wynn3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Shields / Tae-Hwa Chun vs Michael Haffey / Barry St Pierre6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesRocco Pisto / Tae-Hwa Chun vs David Konkle / David White6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBruce Shields / Robert Tinney vs Christopher White / Joseph Devereaux6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDouglas Quint / Marvin Sauer vs James Feustel / Michael Coffey6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesRocco Pisto / James McKenzie vs Josh Kerst / Patrick Lee6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSean Grant / Tae-Hwa Chun vs Michael Wynn / David Sitz3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesThomas Belcher / Clarence Lewis vs Terry Bowman / Jeff Hill0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJames McKenzie / Rocco Pisto vs Patrick Haley / Michael Wynn6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSean Grant / Thomas Belcher vs Patrick Lee / David Sitz3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesJames McKenzie / Rocco Pisto vs David White / Steve Eder6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTae-Hwa Chun / Sean Grant vs Howard Scheps / Joseph Devereaux6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBruce Shields / Thomas Belcher vs James Feustel / Michael Tran4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0 MEN TUES PM SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14FAC-HORNE AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F27223414149
23LIB-STPIERRE AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F16215920179
31BOH-VONDELL AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F263141331244
41HV-SHIELDS AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F144141024218
53EAST-KOZIK AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F245111636263
64VTC-inside-FEUSTEL AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F12671736249
72DEER-JENNETT AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F21862144292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Robert Tinney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Sean Grant
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
August Meyers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
James McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Tae-Hwa Chun
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.96
Brad Beaver
published 3.5
2.88
Bruce Shields
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Clarence Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Douglas Quint
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Marvin Sauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rocco Pisto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Belcher
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Shields + Brad Beaver4648% games−3.3% vs expected
James McKenzie + Rocco Pisto9553% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Belcher + Bruce Shields0932% gamesnot enough data
Douglas Quint + Thomas Belcher3346% gamesnot enough data
Douglas Quint + Bruce Shields0526% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Belcher + Rocco Pisto2345% gamesnot enough data
Tae-Hwa Chun + James McKenzie4159% gamesnot enough data
Douglas Quint + Robert Tinney314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Tinney
24W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
Sean Grant
19W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
August Meyers
26W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
James McKenzie
50W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Tae-Hwa Chun
71W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Brad Beaver
26W–28L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.96
3.5
Bruce Shields
30W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Clarence Lewis
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Douglas Quint
23W–27L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
Marvin Sauer
15W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Rocco Pisto
19W–13L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Belcher
33W–102L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.