NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Traver
2026 NWO Mixed 18 & Over · NWO MX 18 & Over 7.0
12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule9 played
i
Flight standings15 teams · NWO MX 18 & Over 7.0
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Keating/Cody Twos | 10 | 0 | 23 | 215 |
| 2NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Bastas/Dippman-TWOS | 8 | 2 | 16 | 156 |
| 3NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Jacobs/Walton -SVC | 8 | 2 | 18 | 194 |
| 4NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad | 7 | 3 | 29 | 253 |
| 5NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Brigode-PTC | 6 | 4 | 34 | 251 |
| 6NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Halbert | 5 | 4 | 30 | 197 |
| 7NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Saini-SVC | 5 | 5 | 34 | 261 |
| 8NWO 18&Over7.0MX Bloomquist/Broadwell | 4 | 5 | 35 | 241 |
| 9NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Gottschalk-TWOS | 4 | 6 | 35 | 265 |
| 10NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Szczechowski | 4 | 6 | 40 | 274 |
| 11NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Smith-PTC | 3 | 6 | 34 | 254 |
| 12NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Traver | 3 | 6 | 37 | 261 |
| 13NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Minicozzi/Damschroder-Launchpad | 2 | 6 | 38 | 232 |
| 14NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Barden/Kleinschmidt-Launchpad | 2 | 7 | 42 | 269 |
| 15NWO 18&Over 7.0MX Olson/Lyden-Belmont | 0 | 9 | 45 | 298 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Paul Traver + Jill Feltner | 7–5 | 54% games | +7.2% vs expected |
| Paul Traver + Emily Atherine | 6–5 | 52% games | +5.5% vs expected |
| Rachael McEwen + Joseph Pesci | 9–6 | 56% games | +1.4% vs expected |
| Rachael McEwen + Paul Traver | 3–5 | 43% games | −6.0% vs expected |
| Jill Feltner + Gabriel Feltner | 6–9 | 46% games | −9.1% vs expected |
| Ani Gonzales + Gabriel Feltner | 3–9 | 41% games | −10.0% vs expected |
| Jay Jones + Jill Feltner | 0–7 | 34% games | −14.5% vs expected |
| Paul Traver + Ani Gonzales | 2–5 | 33% games | −16.3% vs expected |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.