Teams

Lower Woodland (OUTDOORS) Zucker

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-10vs CAC/SL-In Denial-KingLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Chavez / Kathryn Sullivan vs Amanda Ortiz / Steven Nguyen0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Keegan / Thomas Lennon vs Teresa King / Brian Peters3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Sacks / Andrew Sacks vs AL King / Kristin Peters2-6, 3-6
2024-08-03vs RTC-Love All-WhitneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Matyas / Tom Weeks vs Siobhan Whitney / Matt Gerrans7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Wilson / Jeremy Zucker vs Elena Ivanova / Kenn Wildes6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Sullivan / Andrew Sacks vs Pauline Lane / Paul Bifford6-3, 6-1
2024-07-27vs HBSQ-Cho+HenningerWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Sacks / Steve Chavez vs Carrie Wies / William Cohon6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCatherine Wilson / Todd Dunnington vs Norma Brengelmann / Mark Henninger6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBlair Stone / Jeremy Zucker vs Rebecca Ringer / Brian Nelson3-6, 6-7
2024-07-13vs FC-The Immortals-CalpeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeremy Zucker / Sue Matyas vs Ian Bucklin / Jenny Pinkerton6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesThomas Lennon / Patricia Keegan vs Ramon Calpe / Francisca Lehr7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Sacks / Susan Sacks vs Matthew Metz / Teresa Cueto2-6, 1-6
2024-07-07vs HBSQ-The Terminetters-RomaLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Keegan / Thomas Lennon vs Jim Coghlan / Kathryn Swingle5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAndrew Sacks / Susan Sacks vs Tracy Jolly / Henry Farber6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSteve Chavez / Kathryn Sullivan vs Kay Coghlan / Everett Seven3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-06vs EDG-Double Edges-YoungLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wilson / Steve Chavez vs Kay Almer / Thomas Hei2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBlair Stone / Jeremy Zucker vs Teresa MacH / Gary Nevins2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Sacks / Andrew Sacks vs Qi Geng / Jack Young6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-23vs NWW-TCSP-BlumLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Peixotto-Monk / Jeremy Zucker vs Eric Lindburg / Sally Revere5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBlair Stone / Todd Dunnington vs Scott Curtis / Heather Curtis0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Sacks / Andrew Sacks vs Amy Zimbelman / Eric Zimbelman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Angela Peixotto-Monk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Sue Matyas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Patricia Keegan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Catherine Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Susan Sacks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.39
Blair Stone
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jeremy Zucker
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Todd Dunnington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Kathryn Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Steve Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.82
Andrew Sacks
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Valerie Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Thomas Lennon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Tom Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blair Stone + Jeremy Zucker10359% games+11.5% vs expected
Susan Sacks + Andrew Sacks111150% games+1.4% vs expected
Angela Peixotto-Monk + Andrew Sacks303 matchesnot enough data
Angela Peixotto-Monk + Jeremy Zucker213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Keegan + Thomas Lennon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Peixotto-Monk
43W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Sue Matyas
196W–147L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Patricia Keegan
66W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Catherine Wilson
89W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Susan Sacks
116W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Blair Stone
115W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Jeremy Zucker
49W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Todd Dunnington
14W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Kathryn Sullivan
59W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Steve Chavez
36W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Andrew Sacks
20W–28L career · type M · 6 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Valerie Gilbert
62W–93L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Thomas Lennon
44W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Tom Weeks
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.