Teams

EDG-Double Edges-Young

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-11vs NWW-TCSP-BlumLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy Alford / Thomas Hei vs Robin Freedman / Patrick Byrne6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesScott Robertson / Kay Almer vs James Tjoa / Pam MacDuff4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJack Young / Brook Koski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-28vs RTC-Love All-WhitneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Hei / Barry Strand vs Pauline Lane / Matt Gerrans6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTerry Yuan / Jack Young vs Holly Hovey / Ziran Lin6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Alford / Thomas Hei vs Siobhan Whitney / Glynn Omoto6-4, 6-3
2024-07-21vs HBSQ-Cho+HenningerWon 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Hei / Angela Hei vs William Cohon / Carrie Wies4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa MacH / Thomas Hansen vs Peter Chang / Cheryl Isen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrook Koski / Bing Li vs Brian Nelson / Rebecca Ringer6-4, 7-5
2024-07-13vs HBSQ-The Terminetters-RomaWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerry Yuan / Bing Li vs Susan Thornberg / James Roma6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa MacH / Thomas Hansen vs Kimberly Dirksen / Brad Tenney5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesQi Geng / Gary Nevins vs Nancy Roma / Michael Lynagh0-6, 2-6
2024-07-06vs Lower Woodland (OUTDOORS) ZuckerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Almer / Thomas Hei vs Catherine Wilson / Steve Chavez6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeresa MacH / Gary Nevins vs Blair Stone / Jeremy Zucker6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesQi Geng / Jack Young vs Susan Sacks / Andrew Sacks4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-29vs FC-The Immortals-CalpeWon 21
W#1 DoublesTeresa MacH / Barry Strand vs Lisa Brouelette / Zachary Fu6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Alford / Scott Robertson vs Telsin Brower / Frank Weathers1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerry Yuan / Thomas Hansen vs Francisca Lehr / Ramon Calpe6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-14vs CAC/SL-In Denial-KingWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Almer / Scott Robertson vs Martin Ruscha / Teresa King6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesQi Geng / Bing Li vs Gary Garside / Kristin Peters6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrook Koski / Gary Nevins vs Joseph Ching / Kristen Stead3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Barry Strand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Tammy Alford
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Kay Almer
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.41
Angela Hei
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.32
Teresa MacH
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Qi Geng
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Bing Li
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Terry Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Gary Nevins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Thomas Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Jack Young
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Scott Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.79
Thomas Hei
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.73
Brook Koski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa MacH + Bing Li3448% games+1.6% vs expected
Tammy Alford + Scott Robertson3247% games−4.2% vs expected
Teresa MacH + Jack Young71444% games−5.5% vs expected
Bing Li + Qi Geng121350% games−8.2% vs expected
Jack Young + Qi Geng2444% games−12.5% vs expected
Angela Hei + Thomas Hei1739% gamesnot enough data
Teresa MacH + Barry Strand314 matchesnot enough data
Brook Koski + Barry Strand123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barry Strand
101W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Tammy Alford
55W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Kay Almer
170W–161L career · 7 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Angela Hei
54W–45L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Teresa MacH
69W–77L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Qi Geng
64W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Bing Li
108W–113L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Terry Yuan
62W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Gary Nevins
50W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Thomas Hansen
28W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Jack Young
62W–96L career · 3 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Scott Robertson
48W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Thomas Hei
58W–71L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Brook Koski
44W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.