Teams

Shoo/Tantiyavarong/Mountain View

2026 Tri-Level 4.0 · 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-18vs Trifecta/Rogers/Santa RosaLost 12
L#1 DoublesGrace Hruska / Catherine Clements vs Jennifer Rogers / Ploy Atibaedya-Vien5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Herman / Manasa Gadde vs Jennifer Mills / Kelly Sperry2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJunko Ohoka / Kristen Lee vs Sugi Bernard / Annie van Den Toorn6-2, 6-4
2026-04-18vs EarlyBirds/Holm/SunnyvaleLost 12
L#1 DoublesYui Tantiyavarong / Catherine Clements vs Maiko Yano / Cathy Xin0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Herman / Manasa Gadde vs Veeraya Pupatwibul / Winnie Zhang0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Puzon / Kristen Lee vs Ruth Herrera-Flores / Yiwen Xie6-2, 7-6
2026-04-17vs Hit Happy/Van Slyke/PleasantonWon 21
L#1 DoublesYui Tantiyavarong / ALEXANDRA KIRCHICK vs Marianne Dundon / Julia Overs Bates3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Stephens / Kimi Watada vs Noriko Swanson / Jill Van Slyke6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJunko Ohoka / Catherine Puzon vs Barbara Sullivan / Tricia Jacob7-5, 6-4
2026-04-17vs Tri-Angels/Wang/Palo AltoWon 21
W#1 DoublesALEXANDRA KIRCHICK / Yui Tantiyavarong vs Malaika Stoll / Elani Phan6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNicole Stephens / Kimi Watada vs Julia Porter / Tiffany Liew2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Lee / Catherine Puzon vs Amy Yang / May Wang6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Too Much Boba/Chen/Sunnyvale40120158
2Baby Got Backhand/Thomas/San Francisco317510103
3What the heck?/Nicholson/Santa Clara318411101
4EarlyBirds/Holm/Sunnyvale31751185
5Trifecta/Rogers/Santa Rosa31751197
6SushiFighters/Kim/Moraga317512102
7Shoo/Tantiyavarong/Mountain View226612118
8Tri-Angels/Wang/Palo Alto135717127
9SunnyWhale/Jin/Sunnyvale134817127
10Tennismaniac/Steers/Folsom133919123
11Unintended Winners/Tomita/Menlo Park043919123
12Hit Happy/Van Slyke/Pleasanton043920135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Grace Hruska
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.51
Catherine Clements
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.21
ALEXANDRA KIRCHICK
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Kimi Watada
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Nicole Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Samantha Herman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Junko Ohoka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Manasa Gadde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Yui Tantiyavarong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Catherine Puzon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimi Watada + Nicole Stephens213 matchesnot enough data
Yui Tantiyavarong + ALEXANDRA KIRCHICK123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Grace Hruska
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
5
Catherine Clements
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.51
4.5
ALEXANDRA KIRCHICK
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
Kimi Watada
19W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.08
Nicole Stephens
29W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
Samantha Herman
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.02
Junko Ohoka
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
Manasa Gadde
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.88
Yui Tantiyavarong
6W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.87
4
Catherine Puzon
23W–19L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.