Teams

EarlyBirds/Holm/Sunnyvale

2026 Tri-Level 4.0 · 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-18vs Tri-Angels/Wang/Palo AltoWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Ruben / Maiko Yano vs Malaika Stoll / Lisa Liang6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniella Holm / Jenny Wang vs Erika Byrum / Lisa Oktavia6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Wright / Bianca Y vs Amy Yang / May Wang7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-18vs Shoo/Tantiyavarong/Mountain ViewWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaiko Yano / Cathy Xin vs Yui Tantiyavarong / Catherine Clements6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVeeraya Pupatwibul / Winnie Zhang vs Samantha Herman / Manasa Gadde6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRuth Herrera-Flores / Yiwen Xie vs Catherine Puzon / Kristen Lee2-6, 6-7
2026-04-17vs SunnyWhale/Jin/SunnyvaleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Ruben / Cathy Xin vs Jennifer Jin / Kristine Tan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenny Wang / Daniella Holm vs Anusha Arcalgud / Christina Ling6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesYiwen Xie / Rachel Wright vs Tien-Hsin Lin / Jiyun Hong4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLaura Ruben / Atsuko Saito vs Stephanie Areen / Stephanie Alexander6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVeeraya Pupatwibul / Winnie Zhang vs Elizabeth Shalev / Lena Larionova1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBianca Y / Ruth Herrera-Flores vs Margaret Harrison / Maddie Thomas2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Too Much Boba/Chen/Sunnyvale40120158
2Baby Got Backhand/Thomas/San Francisco317510103
3What the heck?/Nicholson/Santa Clara318411101
4EarlyBirds/Holm/Sunnyvale31751185
5Trifecta/Rogers/Santa Rosa31751197
6SushiFighters/Kim/Moraga317512102
7Shoo/Tantiyavarong/Mountain View226612118
8Tri-Angels/Wang/Palo Alto135717127
9SunnyWhale/Jin/Sunnyvale134817127
10Tennismaniac/Steers/Folsom133919123
11Unintended Winners/Tomita/Menlo Park043919123
12Hit Happy/Van Slyke/Pleasanton043920135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Maiko Yano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.84
Atsuko Saito
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.81
Laura Ruben
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.64
Cathy Xin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.36
Daniella Holm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Veeraya Pupatwibul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Winnie Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Jenny Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Bianca Y
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Ruth Herrera-Flores
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Yiwen Xie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veeraya Pupatwibul + Winnie Zhang7454% games+5.2% vs expected
Atsuko Saito + Maiko Yano303 matchesnot enough data
Daniella Holm + Veeraya Pupatwibul213 matchesnot enough data
Yiwen Xie + Ruth Herrera-Flores033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maiko Yano
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.86
5
Atsuko Saito
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.84
Laura Ruben
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
4.81
5
Cathy Xin
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Daniella Holm
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
4.36
Veeraya Pupatwibul
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.28
Winnie Zhang
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13
Jenny Wang
19W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.12
4
Bianca Y
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
Ruth Herrera-Flores
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Yiwen Xie
25W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.