Teams

Unintended Winners/Tomita/Menlo Park

2026 Tri-Level 4.0 · 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-18vs Tri-Angels/Wang/Palo AltoLost 12
W#1 DoublesIsa Chau / Ingrid Ballus Armet vs Lisa Liang / Elani Phan6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Fong / Coreen Aldapa vs Lisa Oktavia / Erika Byrum2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJuliana Bunim / Sarah Tomita vs Bowyee Gong / Cristy Ackerman4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesIsa Chau / Ingrid Ballus Armet vs Stephanie Alexander / Stephanie Areen6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCoreen Aldapa / Jennifer Fong vs Lena Larionova / Elizabeth Shalev6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJuliana Bunim / Sarah Tomita vs Ally Gwozdz / Maddie Thomas2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesIsa Chau / Ingrid Ballus Armet vs Elena Pan / Katharine Dicconson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeora Grimshaw / Jean To vs Elaine Smith / Mae Hoad6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClaudia Vlasak / Linda Geballe vs Kristen Johnson / Michelle Nicholson4-6, 0-6
2026-04-17vs SunnyWhale/Jin/SunnyvaleLost 12
L#1 DoublesShelly Bartlett Sweeney / Cynthia Bascara vs Dolores Podesta / Julie Silveira6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeora Grimshaw / Jana Chang vs Jennifer Jin / Kristine Tan2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLinda Geballe / Claudia Vlasak vs Jiyun Hong / Meng-Lun Tsai6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Too Much Boba/Chen/Sunnyvale40120158
2Baby Got Backhand/Thomas/San Francisco317510103
3What the heck?/Nicholson/Santa Clara318411101
4EarlyBirds/Holm/Sunnyvale31751185
5Trifecta/Rogers/Santa Rosa31751197
6SushiFighters/Kim/Moraga317512102
7Shoo/Tantiyavarong/Mountain View226612118
8Tri-Angels/Wang/Palo Alto135717127
9SunnyWhale/Jin/Sunnyvale134817127
10Tennismaniac/Steers/Folsom133919123
11Unintended Winners/Tomita/Menlo Park043919123
12Hit Happy/Van Slyke/Pleasanton043920135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Cynthia Bascara
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.61
Isa Chau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Shelly Bartlett Sweeney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Ingrid Ballus Armet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Jean To
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Jennifer Fong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Leora Grimshaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Liza Geary
published
4.02
Jana Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Coreen Aldapa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Juliana Bunim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Linda Geballe
published
3.73
Sarah Tomita
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Claudia Vlasak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Vlasak + Linda Geballe3246% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Tomita + Juliana Bunim3252% gamesnot enough data
Ingrid Ballus Armet + Isa Chau213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cynthia Bascara
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.62
Isa Chau
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
4.61
Shelly Bartlett Sweeney
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
Ingrid Ballus Armet
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.39
Jean To
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
4.35
Jennifer Fong
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
Leora Grimshaw
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Liza Geary
7W–13L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
Jana Chang
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Coreen Aldapa
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Juliana Bunim
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Linda Geballe
50W–24L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Sarah Tomita
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Claudia Vlasak
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.