Teams

Colleyville Park/Coffindaffer W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W4.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-27vs Chandlers Landing/Oelke-Lee W4.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesDaniella Bowling / Nidia Bridges vs Fonn Lee / Leslie Oelke6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKelda Rusher vs Suzi Donaghe7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWinnie Stimmel / Edith Kruckmann vs Tammie Bean / Laya Gan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTrish Chandler / Jo Ann Compton vs Misty Carlyle / Beverly Melton6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-02-07vs DAC/E.Bein-Jolly W4.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKelda Rusher vs Megan Fellman6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEugenia Viejobueno / Christina Perron vs Laura Jolly / Andrea Ivey6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEdith Kruckmann / Sandra Ricaud vs Ryan Conner / Yvette Freeman4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Eugenia Viejobueno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Marnie Pizzitola
published
3.91
Thea Junt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Daniella Bowling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Christina Perron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Edith Kruckmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Taylor Montesi
published
3.76
3.75
Jamie McCrary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Kelda Rusher
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.73
Nidia Bridges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Andrea Taylor
published 4
3.70
Gilda Tebeaux
published
3.67
Winnie Stimmel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Trish Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Amy Dabbous
published 4
3.60
Caryn Angus
published 4
3.55
Jo Ann Compton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Cami Gorsky
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marnie Pizzitola + Edith Kruckmann13369% games+7.3% vs expected
Amy Dabbous + Jamie McCrary5160% games+6.4% vs expected
Thea Junt + Kelda Rusher14361% games+2.0% vs expected
Edith Kruckmann + Winnie Stimmel7261% games−3.0% vs expected
Daniella Bowling + Eugenia Viejobueno7074% gamesnot enough data
Christina Perron + Eugenia Viejobueno3253% gamesnot enough data
Thea Junt + Jamie McCrary314 matchesnot enough data
Edith Kruckmann + Eugenia Viejobueno224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eugenia Viejobueno
38W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
Marnie Pizzitola
64W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Thea Junt
43W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Daniella Bowling
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Christina Perron
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Edith Kruckmann
41W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Taylor Montesi
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Jennifer Coffindaffer
127W–78L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Jamie McCrary
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Kelda Rusher
40W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Nidia Bridges
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Andrea Taylor
51W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Gilda Tebeaux
34W–29L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Winnie Stimmel
38W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.67
Trish Chandler
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Amy Dabbous
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Caryn Angus
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jo Ann Compton
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Cami Gorsky
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.