Teams

OC Lifetime San Clemente - Tiffney

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-21vs OC Coto De Caza - 830Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDarcy Kendrick / Natalie Finn vs Tana Ashton / Lauren Ramirez3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDarcy Kendrick / Natalie Finn vs Laura MacCartie / Laura Barron6-4, 6-3
2025-03-05vs OC Mesa Verde CC - Julie 930Won 21
W#1 DoublesShari Harris / Darlene Redburn vs Reiko Kurakazu / Renee Carlson6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChrissy Bird / MeganMary Mills vs Julie Leigh / Cindy Galitski6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTiffney Beckloff / Renee Beckloff vs Linda Marcopulos / Heather Plascencia2-6, 2-6
2025-02-28vs OC Marguerite MVTC - Caroline 1030Split 22
L#1 DoublesHeather Donovan / Darlene Redburn vs Ellen Aistars / Laura Anderson5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChelsea van Niekerk vs Michelle Levene6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCrosby Burke / Julie Vivalda vs Leah Dietz / Caroline Gee6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLois Russell / MeganMary Mills vs Kelley McBride / Jenny Thurrell1-6, 2-6
2025-01-31vs OC NBTC - Elaiza - 10Split 22
L#1 DoublesDarlene Redburn / Heather Donovan vs Larah Telesco / Allegra Fulcher3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChelsea van Niekerk vs Kristy Gladding6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChrissy Bird / Stephanie Colson vs Elaiza Capan / Leigh Donaldson Carman6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLois Russell / MeganMary Mills vs Sandy Danz / Nonette Swart6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatalie Finn vs Nikki Bartlette6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-17vs OC LNRC - KristieLost 01
L#1 SinglesNatalie Finn vs Dayna Marinos4-6, 3-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Chelsea van Niekerk
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.58
Mariela Farley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Tania Reed
published
3.53
Julie Vivalda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Crosby Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Samantha Ackad
published
3.31
Heather Donovan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Cori Sperbeck
published 3.5
3.29
Stephanie Colson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Darlene Redburn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Natalie Finn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Darcy Kendrick
published 3.5
3.13
Renee Beckloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
MeganMary Mills
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Chrissy Bird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Tiffney Beckloff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Sue Michailidis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Lois Russell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kristin Georgi
published
Linda Richardi
published
Shari Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Donovan + Crosby Burke6165% games+4.9% vs expected
Linda Richardi + Shari Harris7064% gamesnot enough data
Tiffney Beckloff + Chrissy Bird134 matchesnot enough data
Tania Reed + Mariela Farley404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chelsea van Niekerk
36W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.64
3.5
Mariela Farley
40W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Tania Reed
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Julie Vivalda
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Crosby Burke
22W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Samantha Ackad
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Heather Donovan
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Cori Sperbeck
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Stephanie Colson
41W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Darlene Redburn
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Natalie Finn
16W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Darcy Kendrick
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Renee Beckloff
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
MeganMary Mills
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Chrissy Bird
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Tiffney Beckloff
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Sue Michailidis
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Lois Russell
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Kristin Georgi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Richardi
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shari Harris
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.