Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Jo

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 4.0W

20 players · average NTRP 3.89 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#2 DoublesKelly Lombardo / Lindsay Kimmes vs Michelle Smith / Marianne Richards1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Jacqueline Jernigan vs Sharon Fujihara / Judy Khang4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesChristine Callas / Catherine Fullerton vs Carrie Anderson / Jennifer Quinsey7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShelly Hilliard / Ida Shu vs Suzanne Corvese / Linda Richardi7-5, 6-1
2025-03-17vs OC Costa Mesa TC - SabrinaSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCatherine Fullerton vs Jill Brown6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Kelly / Lindsay Kimmes vs Brittany Nevins / Kim Schattinger6-1, 6-2
2025-03-04vs OC DHTC - Dara - 1030Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Jernigan / Catherine Fullerton vs Lyndsay Boberg / Kelly Dishno4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Michelle Bachand vs Michelle Espeleta / Kristin Pokrass1-6, 1-6
2025-02-28vs OC Lifetime SC - MerwinLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Eveline Gani vs Annette Drake / Lynn Moore7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-02-21vs OC Great Park Irvine - Miki - 10Lost 02
L#1 SinglesIda Shu vs Junko Aoki4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Lisa Rhoads vs Yukari Nobuhara / Ai Freger6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-31vs OC Lifetime RSC - KellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Callas / Catherine Fullerton vs Michelle Duenas / Rebekah Dent5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-17vs OC Acers - YLCC - HollyLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Callas / Catherine Fullerton vs PAMELA WEBB / Mandy Cuan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-10vs OC NBTC - NedraLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Janna McConnell vs Carrie Jackson / Terri Hamm6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Audra Smith
published 4
3.83
Catherine Fullerton
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Christine Callas
published 4
3.70
Ida Shu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Kelly Lombardo
published
3.64
Eveline Gani
published
3.60
Nancy Shih
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Lindsay Kimmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.44
Lacey Seward
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.43
Shelly Hilliard
published
3.41
Lauren Prelesnik
published
3.37
Lisa Rhoads
published
3.33
Janna McConnell
published
3.29
Mary Read
published
3.29
Carmen Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Josephine Garrett
published
3.21
Jacqueline Jernigan
published
3.16
Lisa Wellman
published
Mary Amen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmen Johnson + Audra Smith5160% games+12.1% vs expected
Lacey Seward + Catherine Fullerton10855% games+10.6% vs expected
Lacey Seward + Carmen Johnson6752% games−2.1% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Lauren Prelesnik2542% games−2.1% vs expected
Ida Shu + Nancy Shih5448% games−6.9% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Nancy Shih314 matchesnot enough data
Josephine Garrett + Kelly Lombardo044 matchesnot enough data
Rosalinda Fazio + Eveline Gani033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audra Smith
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Catherine Fullerton
92W–50L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ida Shu
61W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Kelly Lombardo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Eveline Gani
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Nancy Shih
67W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Lindsay Kimmes
40W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 7 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Lacey Seward
95W–61L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
Shelly Hilliard
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Lauren Prelesnik
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
Lisa Rhoads
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Janna McConnell
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Mary Read
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
Carmen Johnson
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Jacqueline Jernigan
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Lisa Wellman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Mary Amen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.