Teams

Vineyards/ Gustafuson

2024 Collier Adult 18 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-28vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Wong / Gina Adiutori vs Tonja Brewer / Megan MacKrory6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNicki Sebold / Tracy Stuben vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-14vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Foley / Dana Wagoner vs Elizabeth Hayes / Megan MacKrory6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiana Wong / Nicki Sebold vs Cheryl Cohen / Charleen Bridgett6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-07vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Stuben / Dana Wagoner vs Charleen Bridgett / Erica Kline6-2, 6-0
2023-10-24vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 20
W#2 DoublesJane Jhanji / Gina Adiutori vs Erica Kline / Megan MacKrory6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDana Wagoner / Amanda Myers vs Karen Defiore / Kristy Cardina6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-17vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 10
W#2 DoublesDana Wagoner / Diana Wong vs Tonja Brewer / Kristy Cardina6-3, 6-3
2023-10-10vs Pelican Bay Park - KraftWon 20
W#1 SinglesDana Wagoner vs Erica Kline6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTara Newhall / Gina Adiutori vs Diana Britton / Tonja Brewer6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Dana Wagoner
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4.5
4.31
Nicki Sebold
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4.5
4.26
Tara Newhall
published
4.25
Diana Wong
published 4.5
4.23
Gina Adiutori
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
published
4.19
Jane Jhanji
published
4.08
Stephanie Foley
published
Kari Gustafson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicki Sebold + Dana Wagoner5457% games−2.6% vs expected
Gina Adiutori + Dana Wagoner5552% games−6.6% vs expected
Jane Jhanji + Stephanie Foley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Wagoner
149W–38L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Nicki Sebold
120W–44L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Tara Newhall
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Diana Wong
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Gina Adiutori
197W–104L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Mackenzie Rickman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Jane Jhanji
16W–23L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.19
Stephanie Foley
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
Kari Gustafson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.