Teams

SOLANO TA/IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Raquel Barrera
published
3.35
Kay Johnson
published
3.30
Gloria Spencer
published
3.30
Janine Carlson
published
3.19
Ellen McDaniel
published
3.15
Katie Pietrowski
published
3.14
Nancy Orellana
published
3.11
Melissa Fimbres
published
3.05
Debra Lister
published
3.04
Jessica Thornton
published
3.03
Maggie Celestini
published
3.00
Kimberly McAlister
published
2.97
Cynthia Oanes
published 3.5
2.94
Michelle van de Pol
published
2.86
2.84
Josephine Rosman
published
Bobbi Jacoby
published 3
Carmen Dwyer
published 3
2.25
Catalina Barajas
published 2.5
Fely Mariuzza
published
Imelda Lee
published
Leanne Outlaw Rahn
published
Tatiana Orellana
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Lister + Ellen McDaniel213 matchesnot enough data
Imelda Lee + Andrea Li Fen Hsu303 matchesnot enough data
Raquel Barrera + Gloria Spencer213 matchesnot enough data
Katie Pietrowski + Kimberly McAlister213 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly McAlister + Maggie Celestini213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Raquel Barrera
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
Kay Johnson
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Gloria Spencer
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Janine Carlson
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Ellen McDaniel
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Katie Pietrowski
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Nancy Orellana
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Melissa Fimbres
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Debra Lister
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jessica Thornton
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Maggie Celestini
30W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Kimberly McAlister
31W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Cynthia Oanes
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Michelle van de Pol
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Andrea Li Fen Hsu
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Josephine Rosman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Bobbi Jacoby
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carmen Dwyer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Catalina Barajas
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Fely Mariuzza
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Imelda Lee
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leanne Outlaw Rahn
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tatiana Orellana
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.